Skip to content

Member

Tineke STRIK

Greens · Netherlands

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
91.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.4 %ⓘ of 569 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
PRO Progressief Nederland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
11 of 553 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), JURI, LIBE
Member id
197772
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.8 %

569 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (−0.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.4 %

554 of 569 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.0 %

11 of 553 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.3 %

30 of 569 votes cast

Participation 91.8 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tineke STRIK91.8 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 97.4 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tineke STRIK97.4 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Paragraph 7 — part 2 437 for, 158 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 337 for, 246 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 456 for, 135 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 170 for, 396 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 150 for, 448 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7 162 for, 312 against, 137 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 290 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 567 for, 25 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2025Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 429 for, 205 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 Jan 2025EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 505 for, 90 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe The Left 196 for, 221 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE 108 for, 313 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1, adding text after recital K 197 for, 342 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital K 328 for, 143 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 14 310 for, 183 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar 170 for, 364 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an 319 for, 183 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 364 for, 120 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 4 356 for, 157 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 328 for, 178 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 366 for, 116 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 1 492 for, 43 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al 154 for, 379 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak 204 for, 355 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag 152 for, 383 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag 210 for, 332 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af 167 for, 384 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 271 for, 268 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 1 549 for, 14 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 264 for, 292 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 424 for, 141 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 355 for, 177 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 1 395 for, 151 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 384 for, 158 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 382 for, 159 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 267 for, 297 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 276 for, 287 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 421 for, 89 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 389 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 551 for, 8 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point q 198 for, 359 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point q 202 for, 361 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 3 398 for, 142 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 362 for, 158 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 400 for, 148 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 14 to paragraph 1, after point i 199 for, 318 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 12 to paragraph 1, point h 164 for, 398 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point a 169 for, 388 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 356 for, 172 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands99 % of 5 218 shared94 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands99 % of 5 303 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands98 % of 4 499 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland97 % of 4 719 shared94 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany97 % of 5 140 shared94 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium97 % of 4 825 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany97 % of 5 269 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland97 % of 4 338 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany97 % of 5 500 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany97 % of 5 057 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 843 shared83 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 436 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 409 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 539 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 055 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 899 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 3 976 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany87 % of 4 699 shared83 %
Pierre JOUVET S&DFrance87 % of 4 880 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 5 074 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember6 Jul 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute7 Nov 2024now
Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE DelegationVice-chair30 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on the Two-State Solution for Israel and PalestineIG10-26 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE23 Sept 2026
The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its interaction with national authorities in the application of Union law, with particular reference to Article 19 TEUShadow rapporteur for an opinionJURI21 Sept 2026
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2026Shadow rapporteurJURI9 Jul 2026
The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its interaction with national authorities in the application of Union law, with particular reference to Article 19 TEUOpinion rapporteurJURI23 Jun 2026
Authorising Member States to accept, in the interests of the European Union, the accession of Cabo Verde to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbductionShadow rapporteurJURI13 May 2026
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries Shadow rapporteurLIBE12 May 2026
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAFET27 Apr 2026
Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partnersOpinion rapporteurJURI16 Apr 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionLIBE5 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionJURI27 Jan 2026

Show all 41 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

54 contributions recorded; 19 on behalf of their group; 82 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
28 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2026Situation of the rule of law in Greece, following the Court decision on Predator spyware (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2026Immunity of International Criminal Court officials and the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to strengthen EU strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Pending approval of the Hungarian national plan for Security Action for Europe (SAFE) funding in light of persistent concerns around the allocation of public funding (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 111

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Support for effective multilateralism and activation of Blocking Statute to protect the ICC E-10-2026-003672Written questionwith 4 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0412Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Serious statements by Markus Lammert regarding the expulsion of unaccompanied children and persons in need of international protection in Ceuta E-10-2026-003413Written questionwith 15 co-authorsNot yet answered
22 Jul 2026Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097Written questionwith 23 co-authors22 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026Implementation of Case C-81/24 (Jenec) and protection against extraterritorial sanctions targeting international justice E-10-2026-002968Written questionwith 15 co-authors17 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026State of play of negotiations on the agreement on the exchange of personal data between Europol and Israel E-10-2026-002925Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
18 Jun 2026Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532Written questionwith 27 co-authors6 Aug 2026
17 Jun 2026Compatibility of Spanish banking practices with EU law on freedom of movement, non-discrimination and consumer protection E-10-2026-002511Written question13 Aug 2026

Show all 111 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 32

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 32 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tineke STRIK”. Member record. memberId 197772. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197772. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197772?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197772,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tineke STRIK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=109&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197772. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197772. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}