Skip to content

Member

Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
81.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.6 %ⓘ of 504 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PNL Partidul Naţional Liberal
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
5 of 478 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (vice-chair), CULT (substitute), ENVI, LIBE, PETI (substitute)
Member id
197636
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.3 %

504 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−9.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

492 of 504 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 478 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 504 votes cast

Participation 81.3 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN81.3 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 97.6 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN97.6 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 5 200 for, 296 against, 82 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 200 for, 349 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 3 196 for, 358 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 177 for, 389 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 1 212 for, 349 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 1 226 for, 293 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 175 for, 387 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 184 for, 367 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 1 174 for, 355 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 169 for, 390 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 1 199 for, 359 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 1 200 for, 335 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 1 210 for, 356 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 1 207 for, 363 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 1 118 for, 375 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 1 207 for, 341 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 1 184 for, 380 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 1 90 for, 482 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 172 for, 379 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 1 118 for, 393 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 1 100 for, 434 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 1 113 for, 378 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 1 179 for, 376 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 1 101 for, 456 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 120 for, 372 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 171 for, 378 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Stock-taking of the European elections 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 388 for, 186 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Stock-taking of the European elections 2024 Amendment 1 153 for, 422 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 459 for, 65 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 201 for, 399 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 197 for, 402 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 208 for, 401 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Amendment 4 to paragraph 5 155 for, 412 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025A new vision for the European Universities alliances Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 461 for, 100 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects Final votePassed 535 for, 36 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects Amendment 84 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 10; Directive (UE) 2015/2302; Article 18, paragraph 2 195 for, 411 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Case of Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 549 for, 2 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Case of Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda Amendment 2, adding text after recital D 166 for, 398 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Case of Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 160 for, 407 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 597 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 6 to recital F 182 for, 406 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Case of Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 175 for, 393 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 5 to recital A 196 for, 338 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 1, adding text after citation 1 424 for, 158 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 9 to paragraph 7 189 for, 374 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 130 for, 448 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 4 to paragraph 4 148 for, 308 against, 130 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 3 to paragraph 2 140 for, 303 against, 132 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 190 for, 353 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Sept 2025Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 490 for, 65 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 4 023 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania96 % of 4 500 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland96 % of 4 477 shared89 %
Daniel BUDA EPPRomania96 % of 4 879 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania96 % of 3 994 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany96 % of 4 040 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 4 859 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania95 % of 4 276 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania95 % of 4 449 shared89 %
Mika AALTOLA EPPFinland95 % of 4 271 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia87 % of 4 683 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 689 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 436 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 4 818 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 3 908 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance86 % of 2 405 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium86 % of 4 694 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland85 % of 3 964 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland85 % of 4 886 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany85 % of 4 886 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember27 Apr 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Iraq, including the EU-Iraq Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-IQ DelegationChair16 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEUDS29 Apr 2025
No dossier namedDelegation chairD-IQ30 Sept 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairAFET22 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded, 7 written statements; 24 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 63

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026Public procurement reform: Higher bills for councils and backroom negotiations? E-10-2026-003593Written questionNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026Why is Brussels funding projects in the North Pole, when Romania has the available graphite and infrastructure? E-10-2026-003584Written questionNot yet answered
13 Aug 2026Impact of AI on reading and interest in books in Europe E-10-2026-003275Written questionNot yet answered
11 Aug 2026Shortcomings in the application of the Digital Services Act in cases where disinformation goes viral pose a risk to citizens’ safety E-10-2026-003251Written questionNot yet answered
24 Jul 2026Risks of new electrification targets on infrastructure and citizens E-10-2026-003117Written questionNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026German Ambassador to Moldova offends Romanians P-10-2026-002929Priority written question10 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Mandatory ceilings for data centre water consumption and impact of AI infrastructure E-10-2026-002764Written question26 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Safeguards for operational neutrality and protection of Romania’s strategic economic interests E-10-2026-002763Written questionNot yet answered
3 Jul 2026Will the Commission’s new omnibus proposals simplify rules for Romanian businesses or saddle them with hidden costs? E-10-2026-002762Written question21 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026Impact of the ban on exports of sheep from Romania E-10-2026-002482Written question21 Aug 2026

Show all 63 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789899 CULT6
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789968 CULT1
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789967 CULT1
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE5
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788939 ITRE37
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788924 ITRE28
19 May 2026Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund ENVI-AM-788820 ENVI2
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788941 ITRE16
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788940 ITRE45
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788922 ITRE36

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN”. Member record. memberId 197636. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=74&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197636?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197636,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=74&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=74&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197636. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}