Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 24

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 24
Result
177 for · 451 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 24 – Am 16
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181676
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 177 for, 451 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 162Abst. 3No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 64Against 6Abst. 3No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 77Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 6Abst. 9No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain020
Finland030
France070
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy080
Portugal010
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment184 for, 392 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 538 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment173 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 540 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment178 for, 393 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 543 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 543 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.96 430 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital F Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment181 for, 384 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 539 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.96 504 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment179 for, 439 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.96 578 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 594 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.95 413 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 24 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181676, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181676 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181676,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 24 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181676}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181676},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181676, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}