Skip to content

Decision

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Effect
Adopted
Result
330 for · 273 against · 38 abstained roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:44–12:49
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a small majority
Source
Committee report by Brando Benifei
Topics
Economy & single marketEU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
20 votes · 20 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call) · Members (7 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
181542
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a small majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 18 parts of the text voted on separately (18 adopted).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 17Abst. 18No vote 11 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 109Against 7Abst. 5No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 61Against 3Abst. 2No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 111Against 46Abst. 10No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.50
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 2Against 26Abst. 1No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 19

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium127120.40
Bulgaria75320.20
Cyprus1500—
Czechia515100.57
Germany6325440.53
Denmark93210.46
Estonia5200—
Spain4010190.68
Finland91320.54
France2645280.42
Greece016230.83
Croatia57000.38
Hungary211080.77
Ireland73220.38
Italy30268120.20
Lithuania7103—
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia5301—
Malta0312—
Netherlands207040.61
Poland939230.67
Portugal153030.75
Romania218040.59
Sweden59610.17
Slovenia4401—
Slovakia58020.42

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&DSpeeches125 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECRSpeeches125 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 20

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call192 for, 443 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
2Paragraph 2 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 2/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘underlines that this, together with the need to abandon fragmented national approaches and strengthen a refocused, accelerated and simplified decision-making process at EU level, will enable the Union to act more efficiently and effectively where it matters most, as a true global actor; acknowledges the importance of addressing blockages in the Council in several areas;’ and ‘all’”Roll call443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
3Paragraph 2 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 2/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call334 for, 278 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
Show the other 19 votesShow the other 17 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 2 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 2/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘underlines that this, together with the need to abandon fragmented national approaches and strengthen a refocused, accelerated and simplified decision-making process at EU level, will enable the Union to act more efficiently and effectively where it matters most, as a true global actor; acknowledges the importance of addressing blockages in the Council in several areas;’ and ‘all’”Roll call443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
3Paragraph 2 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 2/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call334 for, 278 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 8 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 8/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including moving to qualified majority voting (QMV) and the ordinary legislative procedure, when it is needed, in key policy fields; notes that higher voting thresholds should be envisaged in some areas of vital importance;’”Roll call422 for, 189 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
5Paragraph 8 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 8/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call320 for, 291 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
6Paragraph 9 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 9/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Urges the European Council to discuss the proposals set out in Parliament’s resolutions of 9 June 2022 and 22 November 2023 regarding convening a convention in accordance with the ordinary revision procedure provided for in Article 48 TEU, and to consider, where possible, targeted amendments to the treaties via the simplified procedure established under Article 48(6) TEU to speed up essential and urgent reforms; recalls the conclusions of the CoFE, and urges the Commission and the Council to take concrete and timely steps to follow up on these recommendations;’”Roll call388 for, 221 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
7Paragraph 9 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 9/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call315 for, 291 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
8Separate vote on paragraph 10 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 10 Roll call309 for, 302 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
9Paragraph 12 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 12/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘notes that the Draghi report proposes that where unanimous agreement to introduce QMV cannot be reached, willing Member States could also consider resorting to intergovernmental cooperation;’”Roll call385 for, 226 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
10Paragraph 12 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 12/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call393 for, 211 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
11Paragraph 22 — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 22/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Underlines that achieving the EU’s competitiveness goals requires embedding climate neutrality and sustainability objectives within the EU’s institutional and governance framework;’”Roll call463 for, 162 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
12Paragraph 22 — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 22/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call322 for, 289 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
13Separate vote on citation 10 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Citation 10 Roll call340 for, 269 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
14Separate vote on citation 11 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Citation 11 Roll call320 for, 280 against, 47 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
15Recital J — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital J/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the Draghi report also points out that the EU’s decision-making rules have not substantially evolved with EU enlargement and that they need to be strengthened and streamlined in view of future enlargements and the complex global environment;’”Roll call411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
16Recital J — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital J/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
17Separate vote on recital K A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital K Roll call329 for, 277 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
18Recital M — part 1 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital M/1 Part voted on: ‘whereas the Draghi report clarifies that strengthening the EU’s political and institutional model is possible within the existing legal framework, by applying targeted streamlining measures, without the need for treaty change;’Roll call551 for, 58 against, 39 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
19Recital M — part 2 A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital M/2 Part voted on: “whereas the report argues that such measures should focus on deregulation rather than increasing the number of EU rules and procedures;”Roll call378 for, 217 against, 55 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
20Final vote — text as a whole A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained Adopted

Roll call requested by S&D · split votes by Members (7) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0196

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the institutional aspects of the Draghi Report on European competitiveness, which analyses the EU's structural challenges and proposes reforms.

The adopted text calls for extending qualified majority voting in the Council, using passerelle clauses, and enhancing Parliament's legislative powers, including the right of initiative.

It also stresses the need for common European debt instruments to finance investment and for institutional reforms to accompany policy ambitions.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution addresses the institutional aspects of the Draghi report on European competitiveness, calling for reforms to improve EU decision-making, governance, and investment capacity.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2013(INI) · Own-initiative report

Institutional aspects of the Report on the future of European Competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Parliament adopted the text on 25 November 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 9 October 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 17 October 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 25 November 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: AFCO · Author: Brando BENIFEI (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 12 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on AFCO dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on AFCO dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on AFCO dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Decision, 25 November 2025. votingId 181542, document A-10-2025-0196, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-25/11 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-11-25-11,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-25/11}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-25/11},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 181542, document A-10-2025-0196, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}