Skip to content

Member

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
94.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
86.2 %ⓘ of 580 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
20 of 481 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
197501
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.2 %

584 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+2.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.2 %

500 of 580 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.2 %

20 of 481 votes where their group had a clear line

8 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.9 %

81 of 584 votes cast

Participation 94.2 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI94.2 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 86.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI86.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Final votePassed 377 for, 279 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 24 to recital 23 208 for, 465 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 29, adding text after recital 4 184 for, 479 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 28, adding text after recital 2 125 for, 536 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 27 to Article 6, paragraph 1, after point e 205 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 26 to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 205 for, 460 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement Amendment 8 432 for, 202 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 605 for, 68 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement: cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 619 for, 9 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution) Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 192 for, 446 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 518 for, 104 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Agreements on Financial Mechanisms for the period May 2021 - April 2028 (EEA: EU-Iceland-Liechtenstein-Norway; Norwegian: EU-Norway); Additional Protocols to EEC-Norway Agreement and to EEC-Iceland Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 528 for, 121 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 441 for, 173 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 42 181 for, 477 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 41 216 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 28 to paragraph 39 198 for, 434 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 36 115 for, 485 against, 85 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 34 187 for, 469 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 33 149 for, 486 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 32 179 for, 490 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 31 90 for, 579 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Paragraph 31 — part 3 497 for, 135 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 28 130 for, 505 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 28 132 for, 474 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 97 for, 525 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 43 to paragraph 27 96 for, 484 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 26 195 for, 468 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 26 193 for, 472 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 26 186 for, 484 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 191 for, 472 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 25 118 for, 522 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 137 for, 478 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 143 for, 478 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 25 309 for, 304 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 24 182 for, 466 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 184 for, 412 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 22 118 for, 549 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 22 125 for, 524 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 82, adding text after paragraph 22 145 for, 529 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 326 for, 315 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 337 for, 311 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 252 for, 381 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 127 for, 497 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 481 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 75 for, 519 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 20 106 for, 523 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 191 for, 463 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 19 372 for, 279 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 189 for, 471 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 308 for, 309 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 7 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland98 % of 5 484 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 5 014 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland97 % of 5 426 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland97 % of 5 504 shared81 %
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland97 % of 4 727 shared81 %
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 487 shared81 %
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland97 % of 4 554 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland97 % of 5 457 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 363 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 5 294 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 904 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 263 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 167 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 499 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania73 % of 4 572 shared48 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 5 038 shared67 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 193 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 105 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia72 % of 4 548 shared62 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember19 Jul 20246 Oct 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT28 Jan 2026
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteurCONT17 Nov 2025
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and CouncilRapporteurCONT24 Sept 2025
Combating VAT fraud – the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budgetShadow rapporteurCONT3 Jul 2025
2024/0804(NLE) Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – BG nomineeShadow rapporteurCONT14 Nov 2024
2024/2030(DEC) 2023 Discharge - Decentralised AgenciesShadow rapporteurCONT10 Oct 2024
2024/2031 (DEC) 2023 Discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint UndertakingsShadow rapporteurCONT10 Oct 2024
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurCONT1 Oct 2024
\"\"2023 Discharge – European Council and Council – 2024/2021(DEC)\"\"RapporteurCONT12 Sept 2024
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service - 2024/2024(DEC)RapporteurCONT12 Sept 2024

Show all 14 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

56 contributions recorded, 26 written statements; 6 on behalf of their group; 53 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) StatementRead
8 Jul 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate) StatementRead
16 Jun 2026Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) (debate) StatementRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Situation in Lebanon: implementation of the ceasefire, support peace efforts and humanitarian access (debate) StatementRead
25 Mar 2026Combating corruption (debate) StatementRead
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate) StatementRead
11 Feb 2026Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) StatementRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 98

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0411Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the Escalating Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Human Rights Situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0363Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
17 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0329Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0317Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—

Show all 98 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 26 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 197501. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197501?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197501,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=99&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197501. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}