Skip to content

Member

Erik MARQUARDT

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
94.8 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
98.6 %ⓘ of 5 619 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
40 of 5 500 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), CULT (substitute), DEVE (substitute), LIBE
Member id
197462
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.8 %

5 620 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+2.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.6 %

5 543 of 5 619 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (+1.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

40 of 5 500 votes where their group had a clear line

14 opposite (for ↔ against), 20 abstained against the line, 6 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.6 %

260 of 5 620 votes cast

Participation 94.8 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Erik MARQUARDT94.8 %
Greens median92.2 %
Lowest in the group48.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members54
With majority line 98.6 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Erik MARQUARDT98.6 %
Greens median97.1 %
Lowest in the group87.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 19 — part 3 463 for, 101 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 19 — part 2 424 for, 122 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 27 to paragraph 18 484 for, 44 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 15 — part 2 475 for, 90 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 2 to paragraph 14 410 for, 181 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 12 432 for, 108 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 8 to paragraph 12 58 for, 500 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 11 448 for, 129 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 10 151 for, 429 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 9 — part 3 370 for, 205 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 9 — part 2 313 for, 247 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 9 — part 1 403 for, 159 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 21 to paragraph 9 79 for, 510 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 7 to paragraph 9 64 for, 525 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 8 134 for, 447 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 8 377 for, 191 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 7 166 for, 430 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 7 91 for, 515 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 7 68 for, 514 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 7 89 for, 505 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 7 471 for, 61 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 6 to paragraph 6 45 for, 547 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 5 466 for, 118 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 3 105 for, 481 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 3 175 for, 414 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 2 166 for, 414 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 2 132 for, 471 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 2 — part 3 447 for, 135 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 2 — part 2 498 for, 86 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Paragraph 2 — part 1 551 for, 49 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 5 to paragraph 2 76 for, 529 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Separate vote on paragraph 1 565 for, 33 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 50 for, 544 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 380 for, 182 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024EU/USA Agreement on the launch of Galileo satellites from U.S. Territory Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 582 for, 16 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 112 for, 485 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 113 for, 441 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 231 for, 326 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 219 for, 357 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 209 for, 359 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Separate vote on paragraph 6 356 for, 204 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 241 for, 345 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 549 for, 21 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 6 255 for, 316 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 565 for, 8 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 177 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 8 200 for, 400 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 182 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Paragraph 8 — part 2 444 for, 153 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Separate vote on paragraph 7 458 for, 90 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202421
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 2025450
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228227
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253533
2 Apr 2025251250
3 Apr 20256262
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220217
8 May 2025103103
21 May 202522
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202521
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258777
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134134
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186186
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267266
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125120
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 2025660
17 Dec 2025430
18 Dec 2025420
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112112
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141141
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197197
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225225
29 Apr 2026296296
30 Apr 2026680
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 20269896
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127127
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144144
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155152
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 560 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands98 % of 4 456 shared94 %
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany98 % of 5 152 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany98 % of 5 009 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland98 % of 4 769 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany98 % of 5 113 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany98 % of 5 575 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany98 % of 5 545 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland98 % of 4 149 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 965 shared83 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance88 % of 4 503 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 5 000 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 465 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 796 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands87 % of 5 599 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 4 063 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands87 % of 5 109 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 4 003 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 5 116 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working groupMember14 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working groupMember24 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 10 on behalf of their group; 38 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
16 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
26 Mar 2026Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Voting time on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
25 Nov 2025Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan (continuation of debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2025Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan (continuation of debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa Partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 117

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0417Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0398Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0412Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
10 Sept 2026EU exports of banned pesticides E-10-2026-003605Written questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Serious statements by Markus Lammert regarding the expulsion of unaccompanied children and persons in need of international protection in Ceuta E-10-2026-003413Written questionwith 15 co-authorsNot yet answered
22 Jul 2026Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097Written questionwith 23 co-authors22 Sept 2026
22 Jul 2026EU support for the Global Partnership for Education ahead of the 2026 Replenishment Conference E-10-2026-003098Written questionwith 7 co-authors31 Aug 2026
17 Jul 2026Bot networks on X and Instagram – Russian-linked campaign for the election of far-right parties in Europe E-10-2026-003050Written questionwith 5 co-authors14 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian Law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0358Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—

Show all 117 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 32

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
2 Jul 2026on the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 DEVE-AM-790761 DEVE5
8 Jun 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries DEVE-AM-789863 DEVE22
26 May 2026Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities DEVE-AM-789038 DEVE24
25 May 2026Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities DEVE-AM-789037 DEVE32
11 May 2026Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CONT-AM-788828 CONT16
9 Apr 2026Establishing Global Europe CONT-AM-786848 CONT11
1 Apr 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning CULT-AM-786847 CULT31
30 Mar 2026Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034 CULT-AM-786826 CULT26
24 Mar 2026Interim report in view of the consent procedure on a broad package of agreements to consolidate, deepen and expand the bilateral relations with the Swiss Confederation LIBE-AM-786747 LIBE3
10 Mar 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities CONT-AM-785307 CONT12

Show all 32 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Erik MARQUARDT”. Member record. memberId 197462. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197462?page=118&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197462. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197462?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197462,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Erik MARQUARDT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197462?page=118&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197462?page=118&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197462. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197462. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}