Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

European Social Fund Plus post-2027

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 11 Mar 2025
Result
432 for · 155 against · 82 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 March 2025, 13:00
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 13 of 13 on the decision
Official label
A10-0014/2025 – Marit Maij – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2025-0014
Dossier
2024/2077(INI)
Vote id
172158
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 6No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
S&DFor 130Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 53Against 13Abst. 4No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
EPPFor 148Against 14Abst. 6No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 2Against 20Abst. 52No vote 6 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 0Against 83Abst. 1No vote 2 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 12Against 2Abst. 12No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France900
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 605 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 615 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote469 for, 136 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 614 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 2 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeSplit vote451 for, 147 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 610 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote307 for, 146 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 474 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.84 601 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.84 439 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote409 for, 125 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 566 voters
16 Jun 2026Recital AC — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSplit vote442 for, 178 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.83 615 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 67 — part 2 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote363 for, 173 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.83 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172158
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the whole text — European Social Fund Plus post-2027”. Vote, 11 March 2025. votingId 172158, reference 2024/2077(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172158 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-11-172158,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — European Social Fund Plus post-2027}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172158}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172158},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172158, reference 2024/2077(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}