Skip to content

Decision

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group

Effect
Rejected
Result
110 for · 309 against · 9 abstained roll call
Date
10 March 2025, 17:20
Kind
Agenda vote
More facts (4)
Margin
by a large majority
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
172159
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected by a large majority.

The agenda was left unchanged.

Backed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 26Abst. 6No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 90Abst. 0No vote 46 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 34 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 108Abst. 2No vote 77 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 33Against 0Abst. 1No vote 46 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 36 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 13Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 2Abst. 0No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 10

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria38090.59
Belgium410170.50
Bulgaria29060.73
Cyprus0402—
Czechia51114—
Germany14490330.67
Denmark1806—
Estonia0007—
Spain1270320.95
Finland1608—
France28340190.32
Greece112080.88
Croatia0804—
Hungary13017—
Ireland0608—
Italy9235390.43
Lithuania0407—
Luxembourg1500—
Latvia1305—
Malta0303—
Netherlands717160.52
Poland15210170.38
Portugal113070.89
Romania6140130.55
Sweden212070.79
Slovenia1512—
Slovakia64050.40

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 428 members

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Roll call110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group”. Decision, 10 March 2025. votingId 172159. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-10/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-03-10-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-10/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-03-10/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 172159. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}