Skip to content

Member

Katrin LANGENSIEPEN

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
90.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 560 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 542 votesⓘ
Committees
EMPL (vice-chair), FEMM (substitute), IMCO
Member id
197461
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

90.3 %

560 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (−1.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

545 of 560 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.5 %

8 of 542 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.0 %

28 of 560 votes cast

Participation 90.3 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN90.3 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 97.3 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN97.3 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 417 for, 138 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 381 for, 118 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 357 for, 134 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 343 for, 154 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 351 for, 141 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 391 for, 116 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 338 for, 147 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 423 for, 108 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 182 for, 369 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 392 for, 153 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point s 128 for, 376 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 343 for, 146 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 386 for, 165 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 275 for, 252 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 373 for, 139 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p 470 for, 62 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point o 179 for, 368 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 280 for, 265 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 415 for, 97 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 2 240 for, 316 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 420 for, 88 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point j 533 for, 28 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 286 for, 237 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 386 for, 120 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 255 for, 290 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 1 464 for, 33 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point f 200 for, 230 against, 129 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point b 201 for, 248 against, 114 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, point a 104 for, 398 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital O 257 for, 297 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital N 270 for, 287 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 2 258 for, 290 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 1 447 for, 102 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 239 for, 299 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 349 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 2 254 for, 315 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 1 491 for, 43 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 2 246 for, 318 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 1 470 for, 64 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 2 250 for, 310 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 1 467 for, 100 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 211 for, 358 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3 253 for, 321 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG 265 for, 273 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2 269 for, 302 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1 397 for, 133 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2 220 for, 319 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1 426 for, 72 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland98 % of 4 698 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany98 % of 5 113 shared94 %
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany98 % of 4 946 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany98 % of 5 354 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany98 % of 5 368 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands98 % of 4 507 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany98 % of 5 298 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany98 % of 4 809 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany98 % of 5 118 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance88 % of 4 220 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 694 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 834 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands87 % of 5 257 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands87 % of 5 391 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany87 % of 4 550 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 4 023 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands87 % of 4 924 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 910 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 866 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Australia and New ZealandDANZ DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working groupMember14 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupChair co11 Mar 2025now

Show all 16 seats

Dossiers

Show all 22 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

42 contributions recorded; 9 on behalf of their group; 58 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 39

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
13 Sept 2026Repeated ban on Oradea Pride and compliance with fundamental rights in the use of EU funds E-10-2026-003648Written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
11 Jun 2026Forced sterilisation of women with disabilities – data and safeguards in institutional settings E-10-2026-002420Written questionwith 7 co-authors22 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026EU funding for institutional care – data and safeguards E-10-2026-002417Written questionwith 10 co-authorsNot yet answered
11 Jun 2026EU-funded deinstitutionalisation reforms in Romania and implementation of person-centred financing E-10-2026-002419Written questionwith 8 co-authors1 Sept 2026
13 May 2026The sinking of a migrant boat following dangerous circling manoeuvres by the Greek coastguard, resulting in eight deaths P-10-2026-002006Priority written questionwith 17 co-authors26 Jun 2026
5 May 2026Commission meeting with Taliban on deportations of Afghans E-10-2026-001828Written questionwith 20 co-authors4 Aug 2026
9 Apr 2026Transparency of Syria funds P-10-2026-001459Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors7 May 2026

Show all 39 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 15 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Katrin LANGENSIEPEN”. Member record. memberId 197461. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197461?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197461. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197461?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197461,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Katrin LANGENSIEPEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197461?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197461?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197461. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197461. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}