Skip to content

Member

Stefan BERGER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
83.2 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.6 %ⓘ of 4 931 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
71 of 4 705 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON, ITRE (substitute)
Member id
197410
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

83.2 %

4 931 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−6.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

4 813 of 4 931 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+4.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.5 %

71 of 4 705 votes where their group had a clear line

57 opposite (for ↔ against), 13 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

44 of 4 931 votes cast

Participation 83.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Stefan BERGER83.2 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.6 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Stefan BERGER97.6 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37 119 for, 484 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 37 — part 2 469 for, 130 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 39 to paragraph 35 123 for, 476 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 34 — part 2 449 for, 163 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 6 428 for, 151 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 5 443 for, 153 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 4 451 for, 165 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 32 483 for, 106 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 31 — part 2 440 for, 157 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 2 452 for, 86 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 1 565 for, 46 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29 105 for, 501 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 120 for, 459 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 29 102 for, 497 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 29 108 for, 484 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 3 498 for, 97 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 2 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 1 558 for, 47 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 33 to paragraph 29 127 for, 487 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28 153 for, 432 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 137 for, 478 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 28 449 for, 129 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 32 to paragraph 28 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 106 for, 486 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27 135 for, 479 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26 114 for, 482 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25 139 for, 448 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 98 for, 513 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 3 444 for, 164 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 1 558 for, 40 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 30 to paragraph 23 120 for, 472 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 22 77 for, 523 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 6 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 4 461 for, 127 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 2 489 for, 122 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 28 to paragraph 22 121 for, 476 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 4 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 2 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 1 499 for, 105 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 1 189 for, 405 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20 103 for, 488 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 119 for, 485 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 111 for, 494 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20 118 for, 492 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 193 for, 404 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 29 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 2024920
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241817
10 Oct 202443
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129127
24 Oct 20241312
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243635
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244541
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254539
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253029
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228218
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251221
3 Apr 20256253
5 May 202550
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220204
8 May 2025103100
21 May 202520
22 May 20255350
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259189
19 Jun 2025870
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134126
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 202510199
10 Sept 20253431
11 Sept 20256967
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251312
22 Oct 2025186166
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267243
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257569
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125122
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256662
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254241
20 Jan 20266763
21 Jan 2026112105
22 Jan 20265855
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261312
12 Feb 20261410
24 Feb 20264342
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197163
11 Mar 20266051
12 Mar 20263432
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266958
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225210
29 Apr 2026296272
30 Apr 2026680
18 May 202640
19 May 202630
20 May 2026960
21 May 2026980
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 20264038
17 Jun 2026127124
18 Jun 20267775
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267266
8 Jul 2026144138
9 Jul 20266760
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155141
16 Sept 20268066
17 Sept 2026124114

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Axel VOSS EPPGermany99 % of 3 858 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany98 % of 3 129 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany98 % of 4 864 shared89 %
Hildegard BENTELE EPPGermany98 % of 4 423 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 116 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany98 % of 4 392 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany98 % of 4 549 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany98 % of 4 474 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany98 % of 4 801 shared89 %
Lena DÜPONT EPPGermany98 % of 4 039 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 4 407 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland88 % of 3 880 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 4 292 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium87 % of 4 759 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands87 % of 3 699 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany87 % of 3 474 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany87 % of 4 768 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 614 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands87 % of 4 342 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany87 % of 4 843 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial systemShadow rapporteurECON18 Nov 2025
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Shadow rapporteurECON10 Nov 2025
Non-financial commercial real estate statisticsShadow rapporteurECON10 Jun 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

2 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 4 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Mar 2026European Semester (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2025Collaboration between conservatives and far right as a threat for competitiveness in the EU (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
22 Oct 2024Security-related concerns regarding current EU customs scanning equipment and the Customs Control Equipment Instrument funds E-10-2024-002220Written questionwith 10 co-authors5 Jan 2025
19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770Written questionwith 20 co-authors17 Dec 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Stefan BERGER”. Member record. memberId 197410. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=40&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197410?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197410,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Stefan BERGER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=40&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=40&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197410. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}