Skip to content

Member · Former member

Anders VISTISEN

Patriots · Denmark · left on 13 April 2026

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
85.5 %ⓘ of 4 245 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.2 %ⓘ of 3 621 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
O Dansk Folkeparti
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 13 Apr 2026 (left on 13 April 2026)
Against clear line
263 of 2 867 votesⓘ
Member id
124875
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.5 %

3 631 of 4 245 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.2 %

3 048 of 3 621 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

263 of 2 867 votes where their group had a clear line

115 opposite (for ↔ against), 128 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.8 %

428 of 3 631 votes cast

Participation 85.5 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Anders VISTISEN85.5 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Anders VISTISEN84.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 245

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 418 for, 135 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after recital AA 113 for, 475 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 255 for, 252 against, 132 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 39, adding text after recital Q 77 for, 491 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 84 335 for, 272 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Paragraph 67 — part 2 428 for, 173 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 65 127 for, 473 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 191 for, 296 against, 143 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 43 79 for, 460 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 365 for, 182 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 432 for, 95 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG 250 for, 384 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital AH — part 2 of 2 448 for, 186 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE 254 for, 356 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 415 for, 215 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 430 for, 183 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 590 for, 36 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital H 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 87 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal89 % of 3 112 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia87 % of 3 293 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal86 % of 3 445 shared74 %
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU PatriotsGreece86 % of 2 832 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 155 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 173 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia82 % of 1 510 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 3 568 shared74 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain80 % of 2 813 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance80 % of 2 581 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance77 % of 3 106 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance76 % of 3 429 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 2 954 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance75 % of 2 592 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance75 % of 3 276 shared68 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany74 % of 2 500 shared68 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany73 % of 3 026 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany73 % of 3 259 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany72 % of 3 007 shared70 %
Alexander JUNGBLUTH ESNGermany72 % of 3 589 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

46 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 61 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
23 Feb 2026Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein E-10-2026-000742Written question10 Jun 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Nov 2025Upholding the EU institutions’ integrity in the face of networks with links to Hamas E-10-2025-004481Written questionwith 20 co-authors18 Mar 2026
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
4 Sept 2025Transparency of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority E-10-2025-003426Written question17 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025Grooming expenses for European Commissioners E-10-2025-003348Written question27 Nov 2025
10 Jul 2025Requiring taxi drivers to take breaks despite proven periods of downtime without customers E-10-2025-002813Written question5 Sept 2025
7 Jul 2025The common agricultural policy enables animal cruelty E-10-2025-002757Written question18 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025The Commission’s role in ensuring legal certainty, consistency and balance between security and investment in Member States’ FDI screening E-10-2025-002558Written question18 Aug 2025
12 Feb 2025Adoption of the ReFuelEU Aviation Act and the economic impact of mandatory minimum sustainable aviation fuel quotas in the air transport sector E-10-2025-000653Written questionwith 41 co-authors1 Apr 2025
11 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on implementing a mass return strategy to expel illegal migrants B-10-2025-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 36 co-authors—
6 Feb 2025Unknown chemical status E-10-2025-000558Written question2 Apr 2025
29 Jan 2025The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403Written questionwith 36 co-authors24 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025Lack of transparency, misuse of public funds and assurance of sound management in European institutions E-10-2025-000405Written questionwith 38 co-authors25 Mar 2025
2 Dec 2024VAT on artists’ rights and the EU’s requirements for Denmark E-10-2024-002722Written question28 Feb 2025
30 Nov 2024EU state aid rules and applying them to tax exemptions for non-profit bingo games E-10-2024-002706Written question10 Mar 2025
29 Nov 2024Failure to acknowledge vaccine-related harm is creating stigmatisation – urgent need for EU action to ensure research and support for those affected E-10-2024-002698Written questionNot yet answered
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the victory of president-elect Donald Trump B-10-2024-0185Motion for a resolutionwith 44 co-authors—
12 Nov 2024The Commission’s plans to include the revision of the outstanding proposals on animal welfare in its work plan for 2025 O-10-2024-000014Oral questionwith 37 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela B-10-2024-0027Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0008Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
5 Feb 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions FEMM-AM-782486 FEMM32

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Anders VISTISEN”. Member record. memberId 124875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=42&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124875?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124875,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Anders VISTISEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=42&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&page=42&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}