Skip to content

Decision

Public procurement

Effect
Adopted
Result
432 for · 95 against · 124 abstained roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:56–14:10
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Piotr Müller
Topics
Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
90 votes · 62 roll calls · 32 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · S&D (1 roll call) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 10 split votes) · Patriots (1 roll call, 9 split votes) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
178384
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 432 for, 95 against, 124 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 32 amendments (7 adopted, 25 rejected) and 57 parts of the text voted on separately (40 adopted, 12 rejected, 5 lapsed).

Backed by Greens, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by The Left and ESN; S&D mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 30Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 39Against 5Abst. 3No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 8Against 19Abst. 97No vote 12 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.67
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 4No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 66Against 1Abst. 14No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
ESNFor 2Against 22Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 7Against 18Abst. 4No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 63

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria141410.61
Belgium102640.33
Bulgaria123110.63
Cyprus4110—
Czechia171210.78
Germany5429850.39
Denmark120210.79
Estonia4021—
Spain2732550.24
Finland102120.65
France5121270.53
Greece114420.37
Croatia80400.50
Hungary173010.78
Ireland81140.70
Italy301023130.21
Lithuania6032—
Luxembourg4110—
Latvia8010—
Malta2031—
Netherlands260140.94
Poland451340.88
Portugal91740.29
Romania1911120.42
Sweden112710.33
Slovenia8010—
Slovakia58020.42

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches19 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Piotr MÜLLER PolandECRSpeeches28 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreensSpeeches28 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Gabriele BISCHOFF GermanyS&DSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Christian DOLESCHAL GermanyEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Show the other 27 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE FranceRenewSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
David CORMAND FranceGreensSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Leila CHAIBI FranceThe LeftSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Virginie JORON FrancePatriotsSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Radan KANEV BulgariaEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK NetherlandsGreensSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sunčana GLAVAK CroatiaEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nikolina BRNJAC CroatiaEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sandro GOZI FranceRenewSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS HungaryPatriotsSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&DSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Li ANDERSSON FinlandThe LeftSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Klara DOSTALOVA CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Dóra DÁVID HungaryEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pierre JOUVET FranceS&DSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Jeannette BALJEU NetherlandsRenewSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Branislav ONDRUŠ SlovakiaNo groupSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Per CLAUSEN DenmarkThe LeftSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenewSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Hanna GEDIN SwedenThe LeftSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Andreas SCHWAB GermanyEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Adina VĂLEAN RomaniaEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Johan DANIELSSON SwedenS&DSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN FinlandEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Anna CAVAZZINI GermanyGreensSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA SpainEPPSpeeches18 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 90

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 2 - Am 42 Roll call183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
2Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 3/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘sustainable and social’”Roll call603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
3Paragraph 3 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 3/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
Show the other 89 votesShow the other 87 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 3/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘sustainable and social’”Roll call603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
3Paragraph 3 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 3/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 4 - Am 3 Roll call319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
5Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘maintaining high social and environmental standards’”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, ECR
6Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: ‘maintaining high social and environmental standards’ without the words ‘and environmental’Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots, ECR
7Paragraph 4 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “and environmental”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR; split: Patriots, ECR
8Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 6 - Am 4 Roll call362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
9Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
10Paragraph 8 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 8/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to assess the most appropriate legal instrument in view of the forthcoming reform;”Roll call457 for, 178 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
11Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 11 - Am 5 Roll call92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
12Separate vote on paragraph 13 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
13Paragraph 13 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 13/2 Part voted on: “notes the varying degrees of implementation of green public procurement across the Member States, with only one third introducing binding obligations and the remainder opting for voluntary approaches;”Roll call475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
14Separate vote on paragraph 14 Show of hands Rejected
15Separate vote on paragraph 18 Show of hands Rejected
16Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 36 - Am 7 Roll call261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
17Paragraph 36 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Highlights the need to train contracting authorities, including giving an explanation of the rules and adequate clarification of the use of non-price criteria, including the legal basis for the MEAT criteria and the need to ensure the application of Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU to offer legal certainty to contracting authorities so that they feel more confident using them, while maintaining adequate oversight and data access options;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
18Paragraph 36 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “encourages the Commission to further strengthen the professionalisation and training of procurement officials and suggests that the Commission increase funding for further training of contracting authorities to effectively implement the EU public procurement framework;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
19Separate vote on paragraph 37 Counted347 for, 284 against, 19 abstained Adopted
20Separate vote on paragraph 37 Counted343 for, 279 against, 25 abstained Adopted
21Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 39 - Am 8 Roll call228 for, 413 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
22Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 39 - Am 9 Roll call254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
23Separate vote on paragraph 46 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
24Paragraph 46 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 46/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to encourage business participation in cross-border public procurement by refraining from using language criteria to decline bids in tender procedures;”Roll call475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
25Separate vote on paragraph 53 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 53 Roll call613 for, 24 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
26Separate vote on paragraph 54 Show of hands RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: EPP
27Separate vote on paragraph 54 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 54 Roll call440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: EPP
28Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 56 - Am 46 Roll call530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
29Separate vote on paragraph 58 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
30Paragraph 58 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 58/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
31Separate vote on paragraph 59 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
32Paragraph 59 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 59/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
33Separate vote on paragraph 60 Show of hands Rejected
34Separate vote on paragraph 61 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 61 Roll call464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
35Separate vote on paragraph 63 Show of hands RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
36Paragraph 63 — part 1 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 63/1 Part voted on: “Underlines, in the light of CJEU case-law (including Case C-395/18), that contracting authorities are entitled to include requirements based on national labour law in procurement documentation,”Roll call626 for, 20 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
37Paragraph 63 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 63/2 Part voted on: ‘such as binding collective agreements, minimum employment standards, equal pay provisions, and other relevant social criteria; welcomes the clarification by the CJEU that the social and environmental obligations in the Horizontal Social Clause are ‘a cardinal value with which the Member States must ensure compliance’;’Roll call553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots; split: Patriots
38Paragraph 63 — part 3 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 63/3 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to develop guidance and a legal framework, including clarification of the subject matter and its practical application, that ensures legal certainty and empowers contracting authorities – within their own discretion – to apply such criteria without facing disproportionate legal risks;”Roll call554 for, 61 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
39Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 12 Roll call250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
40Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 13 Roll call224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
41Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 14 Roll call226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
42Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 15 Roll call219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
43Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 16 Roll call217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
44Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 24 Roll call255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
45Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 64 - Am 17 Roll call224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
46Separate vote on paragraph 64 Show of hands Rejected
47Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 64 - Am 25 Roll call255 for, 361 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, Greens
48Vote on text inserted after paragraph 64 Show of hands Rejected
49Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 65 - Am 34 Roll call223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
50Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 65 - Am 36 Roll call225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
51Paragraph 65 — part 1 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 65/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘highlights the importance of introducing and implementing sustainability criteria across Member States in a way that reflects current EU legislation;’”Roll call554 for, 40 against, 52 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
52Paragraph 65 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 65/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots; split: Patriots
53Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 66 - Am 35 Roll call236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR
54Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 66 - Am 30 Roll call145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
55Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 67 - Am 18 Roll call118 for, 429 against, 99 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
56Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 67 - Am 37 Roll call280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
57Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 67 - Am 47 Roll call322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
58Paragraph 67 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘emphasises that the Commission should carefully evaluate the potential cost implications, the risks of limiting access to cutting-edge technologies, and the effects on the quality of services and products, while maintaining consistency with the EU’s international legal commitments and not excluding like-minded partners; underlines that any measures to promote the participation of European companies should not amount to protectionism or distort competition;’”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
59Paragraph 67 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: S&D, Patriots; split: Patriots
60Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 67 - Am 19 Roll call307 for, 293 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
61Paragraph 71 — part 1 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 71/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and environmental’”Roll call601 for, 28 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: ECR
62Paragraph 71 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 71/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: ECR
63Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 75 - Am 20 Roll call227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
64Separate vote on paragraph 76 Counted342 for, 285 against, 20 abstained Adopted
65Vote on text inserted after paragraph 82 Show of hands Rejected
66Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 82 - Am 28 Roll call264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
67Separate vote on paragraph 86 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
68Paragraph 86 — part 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 86/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
69Recital E — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘such as environmental and social considerations’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
70Recital E — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: ‘such as environmental and social considerations’ without the words ‘environmental and’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots, ECR
71Recital E — part 3 of 3 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant E/3 Part voted on: “environmental and”Roll call481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: Patriots, ECR
72Separate vote on recital H A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant H Roll call564 for, 52 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
73Amendment 29, adding text after recital L A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant L - Am 29 Roll call114 for, 450 against, 77 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
74Separate vote on recital M Show of hands Rejected
75Amendment 1, adding text after recital N A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant N - Am 1 Roll call307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
76Amendment 2, adding text after recital N A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant N - Am 2 Roll call288 for, 273 against, 74 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
77Amendment 39, adding text after recital R A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant R - Am 39 Roll call142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
78Separate vote on recital Y Show of hands Adopted
79Separate vote on recital Y Counted470 for, 162 against, 11 abstained Adopted
80Separate vote on recital Z Show of hands Rejected
81Separate vote on recital AA Show of hands RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP, ECR
82Separate vote on recital AA A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant AA/1 Roll call590 for, 36 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP, ECR
83Separate vote on recital AA A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant AA/2 Roll call430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP, ECR
84Separate vote on recital AA A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant AA/3 Roll call415 for, 215 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: EPP, ECR
85Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant AE - Am 21 Roll call254 for, 356 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
86Vote on text inserted after recital AF Show of hands Rejected
87Recital AH — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and environmental impact’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
88Recital AH — part 2 of 2 A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant AH/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
89Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant AG - Am 23 Roll call250 for, 384 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
90Final vote — text as a whole A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call432 for, 95 against, 124 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by EPP, ECR (10), Patriots (9) · separate votes by EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0147

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on public procurement, setting out its position on how the EU's procurement rules should be updated.

The text calls for simplifying procedures, boosting competition and SME participation, and shifting awards towards quality rather than lowest price.

It also urges better transparency, stronger oversight, and using procurement to support strategic industries and resilience.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution on public procurement calls for a reform of the EU framework to boost competitiveness, simplify rules, and promote strategic goals like sustainability and SME access.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2103(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 9 September 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 28 November 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 7 July 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 18 July 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 9 September 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: IMCO · Author: Piotr MÜLLER (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 13 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on IMCO dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on IMCO dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on IMCO dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
5 October 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Public procurement”. Decision, 9 September 2025. votingId 178384, document A-10-2025-0147, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/7 (retrieved 5 October 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-09-09-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-09/7},
  urldate = {2026-10-05},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 178384, document A-10-2025-0147, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}