Skip to content

Member

Terry REINTKE

Greens · Germany

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
92.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.3 %ⓘ of 574 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
GRÜNE. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
0 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
103381
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.6 %

574 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+0.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.3 %

570 of 574 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.3 %

19 of 574 votes cast

Participation 92.6 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Terry REINTKE92.6 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.3 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Terry REINTKE99.3 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Oct 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group 331 for, 37 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group 124 for, 281 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group 421 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 204 for, 372 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 360 for, 210 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 2 206 for, 373 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 — part 1 188 for, 374 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 3 to recital B 195 for, 394 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Separate vote on paragraph 17 272 for, 307 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 1 to paragraph 15 174 for, 413 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 188 for, 399 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 190 for, 415 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 13 — part 2 291 for, 295 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 13 — part 1 479 for, 68 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 6 to paragraph 13 185 for, 410 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 10 — part 2 287 for, 270 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 10 — part 1 409 for, 125 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 285 for, 238 against, 91 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 199 for, 400 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 3 298 for, 279 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 2 415 for, 177 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 4 — part 1 478 for, 69 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 1 — part 2 293 for, 289 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Paragraph 1 — part 1 442 for, 134 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Second World Summit for Social Development Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 173 for, 403 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 97 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 54 for, 464 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Separate vote on paragraph 33 416 for, 140 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 32 — part 2 378 for, 160 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 27 — part 3 204 for, 380 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 27 — part 2 233 for, 272 against, 104 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 10 — part 2 369 for, 212 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 10 — part 1 361 for, 210 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 9 — part 3 356 for, 218 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Separate vote on paragraph 6 443 for, 112 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 5 — part 2 533 for, 9 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 5 — part 1 543 for, 15 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 65 for, 457 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 57 for, 443 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 86 for, 451 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Paragraph 2 — part 2 540 for, 34 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 504 for, 74 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 6 to recital I 250 for, 355 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 5 to recital C 235 for, 363 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 10 to paragraph 8 222 for, 381 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 199 for, 391 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 145 for, 444 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 194 for, 408 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 228 for, 367 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Oct 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 535 for, 24 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany99 % of 5 052 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany99 % of 5 187 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany99 % of 5 457 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany99 % of 4 999 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany99 % of 5 473 shared94 %
Michael BLOSS GreensGermany99 % of 5 369 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 4 639 shared94 %
Martin HÄUSLING GreensGermany99 % of 5 222 shared94 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany99 % of 4 894 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 4 352 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands89 % of 4 795 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 886 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance88 % of 3 793 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 339 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany88 % of 4 617 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 5 469 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 984 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany87 % of 3 905 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 7 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

43 contributions recorded; 40 on behalf of their group; 98 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 3

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
3 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Terry REINTKE”. Member record. memberId 103381. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 3 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/103381?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-103381,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/103381?page=71&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-03},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 103381. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/103381. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}