Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 40 to paragraph 36

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 40 to paragraph 36
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
279 for · 305 against · 43 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 123 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 36 – Am 40
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187289
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 10Against 144Abst. 6No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 8Against 40Abst. 24No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
PatriotsFor 33Against 26Abst. 7No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 3Against 19Abst. 3No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 16Against 7Abst. 3No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Spain200
Finland300
France600
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 541 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 564 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 551 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 563 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 565 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 570 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 590 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 578 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment304 for, 302 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 586 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment255 for, 252 against, 132 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 560 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187289
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187289, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187289 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187289,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187289}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187289},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187289, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}