Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 22 — part 6

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Paragraph 22 — part 6
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
441 for · 166 against · 17 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 76 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Greens, ECR, Patriots
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/6
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187241
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 45Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 120Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 157Against 3Abst. 2No vote 24 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 3Against 66Abst. 4No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 4No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 5No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Spain200
Finland300
France600
Greece200
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

No vote recorded, 94

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 94 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 552 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 536 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 61 Public procurementSeparate vote464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 169 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 500 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment461 for, 185 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 565 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 560 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 541 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.93 560 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 556 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Split vote444 for, 176 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 600 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187241
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 22 — part 6 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187241, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187241 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187241,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 22 — part 6 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187241}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187241},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187241, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}