Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 58 — part 1, after paragraph 20

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote
Amendment 58 — part 1, after paragraph 20
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 10 Mar 2026
Result
199 for · 402 against · 20 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 55 of 260 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0025
Dossier
2025/2070(INI)
Vote id
187218
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Demands the immediate repeal of Directive (EU) 2023/959, which introduces the emissions trading system (ETS 2) covering the building sector,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 122Abst. 0No vote 12 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 26Against 126Abst. 8No vote 26 of 186Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ECRFor 69Against 0Abst. 4No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 8No vote 7 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Cyprus010
Germany040
Spain020
Finland030
France060
Greece020
Ireland030
Italy0100
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 621 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 92 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment220 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 558 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 496 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 50 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment220 for, 415 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, S&D, Renewr · shared0.94 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.94 560 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 51 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment217 for, 416 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens, Renewr · shared0.93 558 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 8 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment191 for, 371 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 505 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment204 for, 359 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 503 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 518 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 95 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment216 for, 412 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 567 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 91 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment214 for, 408 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 562 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187218
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 58 — part 1, after paragraph 20 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. Vote, 10 March 2026. votingId 187218, reference 2025/2070(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187218 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-03-10-187218,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 58 — part 1, after paragraph 20 — Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187218}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-03-10/187218},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 187218, reference 2025/2070(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}