Skip to content

Decision

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Effect
Adopted
Result
390 for · 218 against · 29 abstained roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:30–14:47
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Billy Kelleher
Topics
HealthJobs, social affairs & equality Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
98 votes · 53 roll calls · 3 amendments
Requested by
Renew (1 roll call) · Members (A) (31 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Members (B) (1 roll call, 2 split votes)
Final vote
196156
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 94 parts of the text voted on separately (84 adopted, 10 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D and Renew; opposed by EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 69Against 74Abst. 12No vote 29 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ECRFor 3Against 70Abst. 2No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 33Against 37Abst. 4No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 10No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Voted against their group, 6

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria911000.33
Belgium150520.63
Bulgaria94040.54
Cyprus5100—
Czechia105150.44
Germany4239770.22
Denmark103020.65
Estonia4102—
Spain2828040.25
Finland111030.88
France658260.80
Greece155100.57
Croatia4323—
Hungary811010.37
Ireland8006—
Italy35273110.31
Lithuania65000.32
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia6300—
Malta3201—
Netherlands219010.55
Poland1926260.33
Portugal162030.83
Romania974130.17
Sweden174000.71
Slovenia4500—
Slovakia67200.20

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches116 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Billy KELLEHER IrelandRenewSpeeches116 Sept 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 98

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1 Counted357 for, 275 against, 18 abstained Adopted
2Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘systemic’ and ‘and gender-diverse people’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
3Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “systemic”Counted311 for, 332 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
Show the other 97 votesShow the other 95 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘systemic’ and ‘and gender-diverse people’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
3Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “systemic”Counted311 for, 332 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 1 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “and gender-diverse people”Counted336 for, 286 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
5Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including sexual and reproductive health services,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
6Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted437 for, 176 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
7Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 3/1 Part voted on: “Highlights that inequalities in healthcare are compounded by intersectional inequalities and discrimination, including those linked to gender, age, socio-economic status, disability, race or geographical location and those experienced by people from ethnic minorities, refugee, migrant and LGBTIQ+ communities, survivors of gender-based violence and women deprived of their liberty;”Roll call406 for, 200 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
8Paragraph 3 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 3/2 Part voted on: “stresses that employment, housing and income insecurities, as well as unpaid care responsibilities, deepen gender inequalities in health and limit access to timely, quality and affordable care; points out that inequalities are also evident in gender-specific conditions, as research into these conditions has been repeatedly undervalued and underfunded; notes that stigma, the visibility of symptoms and cultural perceptions of disease can further exacerbate barriers to timely diagnosis and care for women;”Roll call490 for, 141 against, 26 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
9Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and culturally’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
10Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
11Paragraph 6 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: ‘Calls on policymakers and healthcare professionals to take a holistic, rights-based and intersectional approach to addressing inequalities, in line with the principle of subsidiarity, and to correct discrepancies with binding, measurable targets and accountability as innovative new treatments and procedures are developed; calls for the incorporation of a sex- and gender-informed perspective in all EU health legislation and initiatives;’ without the words ‘to take a holistic, right-based and intersectional approach’ and ‘binding’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A), Members (B)
12Paragraph 6 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “to take a holistic, right-based and intersectional approach”Counted308 for, 333 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A), Members (B)
13Paragraph 6 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “binding”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A), Members (B)
14Paragraph 6 — part 4 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 6/4 Part voted on: ‘emphasises the importance of science-based, efficient and innovation-friendly health policies that take into account biological and social differences between women and men and that address the disparities therein; reiterates that research and innovation models in the health sector should drive developments that are in the interest of citizens;’ without the words ‘and social’Roll call601 for, 46 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A), Members (B)
15Paragraph 6 — part 5 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 6/5 Part voted on: “and social”Roll call342 for, 280 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A), Members (B)
16Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – After § 6 – Am 6 Roll call194 for, 309 against, 145 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew
17Paragraph 7 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and binding’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
18Paragraph 7 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
19Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7 Counted357 for, 274 against, 15 abstained Adopted
20Paragraph 8 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/1 Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen health literacy by funding targeted, evidence-based, awareness-raising and communication campaigns to ensure that women and other vulnerable groups can make informed decisions about their health;”Roll call501 for, 61 against, 74 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
21Paragraph 8 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/2 Part voted on: “stresses the importance of reliable, evidence-based and age-appropriate health information for women and girls as well as men and boys throughout the life course, and of education on SRHR, including fertility, pregnancy, contraception, maternal health and post-natal care, consent, bodily integrity, privacy, personal autonomy, respect and the prevention of gender-based violence;”Roll call472 for, 133 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
22Paragraph 8 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 8/3 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to issue recommendations to the Member States on the provision of comprehensive sexuality education, in line with UNESCO standards;”Roll call388 for, 169 against, 88 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
23Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘mandatory’ and ‘and gender-’”Counted457 for, 179 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
24Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “mandatory”Counted290 for, 343 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
25Paragraph 10 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “and gender-”Counted302 for, 330 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
26Vote on text inserted after paragraph 10 Counted319 for, 317 against, 10 abstained Adopted
27Paragraph 11 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘gender-diverse and’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
28Paragraph 11 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted321 for, 286 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
29Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘mandatory’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
30Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “that word”Counted290 for, 361 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
31Paragraph 16 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 16/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘systemic’, ‘transgender and gender-diverse people,’ and ‘and transgender and intersex individuals’”Roll call539 for, 20 against, 88 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
32Paragraph 16 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 16/2 Part voted on: “systemic”Roll call339 for, 302 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
33Paragraph 16 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 16/3 Part voted on: “transgender and gender-diverse people,”Roll call330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
34Paragraph 16 — part 4 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 16/4 Part voted on: “and transgender and intersex individuals”Roll call353 for, 224 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
35Paragraph 18 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 18/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘compulsory,’ and ‘on SRHR,’”Roll call435 for, 197 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
36Paragraph 18 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 18/2 Part voted on: “compulsory,”Roll call299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
37Paragraph 18 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 18/3 Part voted on: “on SRHR,”Roll call399 for, 182 against, 72 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
38Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – After § 19 – Am 7 Roll call278 for, 304 against, 69 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew
39Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – After § 19 – Am 8 Roll call215 for, 294 against, 144 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew
40Paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 21/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the denial of abortion care, intersex genital mutilation, obstetric and gynaecological violence, and malpractice in medical settings are forms of gender-based violence;’”Roll call548 for, 37 against, 60 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
41Paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 21/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call433 for, 135 against, 65 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
42Paragraph 24 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 24/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘compulsory,’”Roll call532 for, 42 against, 82 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
43Paragraph 24 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 24/2 Part voted on: “that word”Roll call337 for, 303 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
44Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: ‘Warns that women’s health medicines are not adequately prioritised in EU efforts to protect against shortages and supply disruptions, despite routine shortages of abortion medicine and contraception, among others, in Member States;’Counted417 for, 150 against, 74 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
45Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Council to align with Parliament’s proposal to recognise abortifacient and contraceptive medicinal products as medicinal products of common interest in the Critical Medicines Act; calls on the Council to consider these products for inclusion in the next revision of the EU list of critical medicines;’Counted400 for, 180 against, 52 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
46Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “calls for the forthcoming Critical Medicines Act to integrate a gender-sensitive approach, ensuring that the identification and prioritisation of critical medicines reflect the specific healthcare needs of women in all their diversity;”Counted397 for, 156 against, 78 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
47Paragraph 39 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Highlights that lesbian women are statistically less likely to access routine screening, often due to misconceptions or previous negative experiences with healthcare providers; underlines the need for tailored information to tackle misconceptions and ensure that lesbian women, transgender and gender-diverse people receive appropriate screening and preventive care, and, in the case of transgender people, gender-sensitive treatment;”Counted342 for, 206 against, 87 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
48Paragraph 39 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘stresses that access to healthcare, including preventive care, should be based on health needs; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan is implemented through a strong gender lens; welcomes the Commission’s intention to issue guidance to financial undertakings on offering cancer patients fair access to financial services, but stresses the need for an EU-wide right to be forgotten for patients who have recovered from cancer, to prevent further discrimination in access to financial services, such as insurance and loans;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
49Separate vote on paragraph 41 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 41 Roll call362 for, 214 against, 75 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
50Paragraph 42 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Welcomes the Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030, put forward by the Commission,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
51Paragraph 42 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘and its commitment to supporting Member States’ healthcare actions regarding SRHR by mapping practices and international frameworks, by developing an EU framework and methodology for systematic data collection to improve the evidence base for SRHR, and by enhancing access to contraception; highlights the upcoming launch, in 2026, of the Sexual and Reproductive Health in Emergencies and Life in Dignity (SHIELD) initiative, which will aim to improve access to SRHR for victims of gender-based violence; calls on the Commission to include further policy and funding commitments, and data collection requirements, in the SHIELD initiative in order to support the Member States in advancing and safeguarding SRHR; is deeply concerned that women and girls with disabilities are far too often denied access to SRHR and stresses the need to safeguard physical integrity, freedom of choice and self-determination, with regard to the sexual and reproductive lives of persons with disabilities;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
52Paragraph 43 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 43/1 Part voted on: ‘Stresses the need to improve the availability of, and access to, abortion throughout the EU; strongly supports the European Citizens’ Initiative entitled "My Voice, My Choice”, which aimed to set up a voluntary, solidarity-based, opt-in EU financial mechanism to ensure safe and accessible abortion in Europe; reiterates its call on the Commission to make full use of its competence in health policy to provide support to the Member States in guaranteeing universal access to SRHR,’Roll call358 for, 210 against, 81 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
53Paragraph 43 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 43/2 Part voted on: “and to enshrine SRHR and the right to safe, legal and accessible abortion in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;”Roll call340 for, 285 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
54Separate vote on paragraph 44 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 44 Roll call349 for, 228 against, 79 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
55Paragraph 45 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 45/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and trans-specific healthcare, and to remove any coercive and unnecessary medical requirements, such as sterilisation, which hinder access to legal recognition and reproductive services,’ and ‘gender identity and/or gender expression,’”Roll call433 for, 153 against, 53 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
56Paragraph 45 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 45/2 Part voted on: “and trans-specific healthcare, and to remove any coercive and unnecessary medical requirements, such as sterilisation, which hinder access to legal recognition and reproductive services,”Roll call327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
57Paragraph 45 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 45/3 Part voted on: “gender identity and/or gender expression,”Roll call334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
58Paragraph 46 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 46/1 Part voted on: ‘Stresses the role of education, healthcare services and public institutions in preventing gender-based violence and promoting consent, bodily integrity, privacy, and personal autonomy and respect, and reducing gender inequalities; stresses that comprehensive, age-appropriate, science-based sexuality education, in line with UNESCO standards, is essential for promoting consent and SRHR, preventing gender-based violence, countering disinformation and stigma surrounding women’s health, and empowering individuals to make informed, autonomous choices;’Roll call470 for, 117 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
59Paragraph 46 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 46/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to issue clear guidelines to the Member States on the provision of comprehensive age-appropriate sexuality and relationship education, in line with international standards;”Roll call406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
60Paragraph 48 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 48/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure access for all to affordable, high-quality, toxin-free and environmentally sustainable – particularly reusable – menstrual products;’ and ‘free or’”Roll call510 for, 78 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
61Paragraph 48 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 48/2 Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure access for all to affordable, high-quality, toxin-free and environmentally sustainable – particularly reusable – menstrual products;”Roll call409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
62Paragraph 48 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 48/3 Part voted on: “free or”Roll call322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
63Paragraph 58 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and advancing SRHR;’ and ‘and budgetary measures’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
64Paragraph 58 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “and advancing SRHR;”Counted413 for, 189 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
65Paragraph 58 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “and budgetary measures”Counted294 for, 339 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
66Separate vote on paragraph 60 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 60 Roll call386 for, 230 against, 40 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (B), Renew
67Vote on text inserted after paragraph 60 Counted339 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Adopted
68Paragraph 62 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to prioritise earmarked funding under the new European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe 2028-2034 (FP10) for research into women’s health;’ and ‘ring-fenced’”Roll call450 for, 168 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
69Paragraph 62 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to prioritise earmarked funding under the new European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe 2028-2034 (FP10) for research into women’s health;’Roll call446 for, 138 against, 59 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
70Paragraph 62 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/3 Part voted on: “ring-fenced”Roll call325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
71Paragraph 63 — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/1 Part voted on: ‘Emphasises the critical role of civil society organisations in providing needs-based, community-level and peer-to-peer healthcare services, particularly for women facing poverty, discrimination or social exclusion; stresses that these organisations act as a bridge between patients and public institutions, and also work to advance gender equality and SRHR, collect data on women’s health experiences and needs, prevent online health scams, and contribute to ensuring more gender-inclusive laws and policies in the field of healthcare;’ without the words ‘and SRHR’Roll call460 for, 129 against, 64 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A), Members (B)
72Paragraph 63 — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/2 Part voted on: “and SRHR”Roll call429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A), Members (B)
73Paragraph 63 — part 3 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/3 Part voted on: ‘calls for their role to be explicitly acknowledged, in the upcoming European Competitiveness Fund and AgoraEU programme, through the earmarking of sufficient levels of funding for civil society organisations working on gender equality and SRHR in both programmes; expresses concern about the shrinking civic space and the decrease in funding available for civil society organisations working on women’s health and rights across the EU; strongly condemns the Commission’s decision to unexpectedly cut funding, including operating grants for health civil society organisations, in the EU4Health programme, and urges the Commission to immediately reinstate adequate funding for these health non-governmental organisations;’Roll call351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (B), Renew; split: Members (A), Members (B)
74Recital B — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital B/1 Part voted on: “whereas multiple and intersecting barriers to accessing healthcare services, as well as complex health needs, are encountered by refugee and ethnic minority women, women living in poverty, unhoused women, women in precarious employment or with unpaid care responsibilities, older women, women with disabilities, women residing in rural and socio-economically disadvantaged areas and individuals from LGBTIQ+ communities in particular;”Roll call395 for, 179 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
75Recital B — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital B/2 Part voted on: ‘whereas an intersectional approach to women’s health is therefore essential;’Roll call411 for, 213 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
76Recital C — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘, culturally sensitive and’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
77Recital C — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted302 for, 313 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
78Separate vote on recital D A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital D Roll call593 for, 37 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Members (B)
79Recital G — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘whereas medical research has historically been male-centric, leading to insufficient understanding of women’s health, physiology and sex-based differences; whereas this systemic inequality in medicine has an impact on the diagnosis, treatment, morbidity and mortality of under-represented sections of the population, including women’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
80Recital G — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and gender-diverse people”Counted322 for, 281 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
81Recital J — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital J/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘transgender, non-binary and intersex people and’”Roll call509 for, 115 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
82Recital J — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital J/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
83Recital O — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and abortion care’ and ‘, as well as intersex and transgender people’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
84Recital O — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “and abortion care”Counted410 for, 173 against, 47 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
85Recital O — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “, as well as intersex and transgender people”Counted319 for, 261 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
86Recital W — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and climate-related health threats’ and ‘, notably related to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
87Recital W — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “and climate-related health threats”Counted341 for, 263 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
88Recital W — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “, notably related to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)”Counted400 for, 163 against, 76 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members (A)
89Separate vote on recital Z A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital Z Roll call431 for, 165 against, 50 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
90Separate vote on recital AA A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital AA Roll call362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
91Separate vote on recital AB A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital AB Roll call354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
92Recital AC — part 1 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital AC/1 Part voted on: “whereas 14 % of LGBTIQ+ people have reported experiencing discrimination in healthcare settings;”Roll call466 for, 128 against, 40 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
93Recital AC — part 2 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital AC/2 Part voted on: “whereas many Member States provide only limited and unaffordable access to transition-related healthcare;”Roll call311 for, 309 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members (A)
94Separate vote on recital AE Counted310 for, 281 against, 37 abstained Adopted
95Separate vote on citation 9 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Citation 9 Roll call353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
96Separate vote on citation 10 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members (A)
97Separate vote on citation 19 A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Citation 19 Roll call359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members (A)
98Final vote — text as a whole A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Renew, Members (B) · split votes by Members (A) (31), Members (B) (2) · separate votes by Members (A).

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0200

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on gender inequalities in health, focusing on gender-specific conditions such as menopause and endometriosis.

The text examines the whole healthcare cycle, from clinical trials and drug development to diagnosis and treatment, and sets out Parliament's official position.

It asks the Commission to use the forthcoming Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030 to propose concrete measures that prioritise and incentivise investment into gender-specific conditions.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution on gender inequalities in health, focusing on gender-specific conditions. It calls for sex- and gender-sensitive research, better diagnostics and treatment, action on endometriosis, menopause, cardiovascular disease and cancer, and universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2074(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 16 September 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 3 April 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 23 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 26 August 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 16 September 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: FEMM · Author: Billy KELLEHER (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy · Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Decision, 16 September 2026. votingId 196156, document A-10-2026-0200, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/18 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-09-16-18,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/18}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-09-16/18},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 196156, document A-10-2026-0200, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}