Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after recital A

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote
Amendment 4, after recital A
Result
217 for · 428 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 48 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Members
Official label
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – After recital A – Am 4
Vote id
177227
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 217 for, 428 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 38Abst. 2No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 18Against 148Abst. 0No vote 22 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 4Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France180
Greece030
Ireland020
Italy080
Portugal020
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 510 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 560 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 22 to recital K The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment219 for, 440 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 608 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.95 566 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 31 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment206 for, 428 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 580 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 554 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 134, adding text after paragraph 35 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment194 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 591 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 563 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4, after recital A — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177227, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177227 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177227,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after recital A — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177227}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177227},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177227, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}