Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 71 to paragraph 14

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 71 to paragraph 14
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
92 for · 496 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 83 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 14 – Am 71
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197158
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 3Against 111Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 1No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 145Abst. 0No vote 38 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 3Against 69Abst. 0No vote 12 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia050
Denmark010
Spain060
France0260
Greece010
Hungary050
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 594 members

No vote recorded, 123

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 123 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 529 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 543 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 530 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.93 480 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 184 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 533 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 528 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 478 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 183 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 535 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 199 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 542 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 529 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197158
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197158, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197158 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197158,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197158}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197158},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197158, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}