Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 77, after paragraph 13

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 77, after paragraph 13
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
330 for · 250 against · 16 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 82 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 13 – Am 77
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197157
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 55 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 2No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 1Against 103Abst. 9No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 7Against 53Abst. 5No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
EPPFor 145Against 3Abst. 0No vote 36 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 71Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 65Against 2Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 0No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany010
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France180
Ireland020
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 596 members

No vote recorded, 121

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 121 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 536 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 536 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 234 + 293 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 275 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 535 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 535 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 535 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 534 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 270 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 226 + 284 (voted as one) to recital 18 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment363 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 536 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 237 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197157
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 77, after paragraph 13 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197157, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197157 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197157,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 77, after paragraph 13 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197157}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197157},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197157, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}