Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 25, after paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 25, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
231 for · 350 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 25
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197101
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 0Abst. 2No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 20Against 37Abst. 6No vote 15 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
EPPFor 2Against 141Abst. 5No vote 36 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 1Against 68Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 3No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium200
Bulgaria010
Germany133
Denmark013
Estonia100
Spain010
Finland030
France930
Ireland210
Italy200
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal200
Romania020
Sweden010
Slovenia110
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 599 members

No vote recorded, 118

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 118 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.93 527 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 527 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.91 501 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 532 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 530 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment200 for, 384 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.91 503 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 548 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 52 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment216 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 538 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 532 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197101
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 25, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197101, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197101 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197101,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 25, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197101}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197101},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197101, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}