Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24, after paragraph 52

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 24, after paragraph 52
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
216 for · 426 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:40
More facts (5)
Position
vote 112 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – After § 52 – Am 24
Text
Report A-10-2025-0192
Vote id
180066
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 216 for, 426 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 112Against 4Abst. 3No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 5Against 67Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 5Against 172Abst. 0No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 1Against 78Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 15Abst. 7No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France900
Greece400
Ireland200
Italy900
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 543 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 532 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 534 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment182 for, 362 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 514 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 533 voters
21 Oct 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther164 for, 319 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.94 437 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 542 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 539 voters
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Freedom Flotilla Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Freedom FlotillaOther164 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 38 %r · shared0.94 400 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180066
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24, after paragraph 52 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180066. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180066 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180066,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24, after paragraph 52 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180066}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180066},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180066. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}