Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29 — part 2

Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)

Vote: Amendment 29 — part 2
Decision: No. 2 of the sitting of 17 Jun 2025
Result: 518 for · 95 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 17 June 2025, 13:38

More facts (6)

Position: vote 8 of 35 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ECR · split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label: A10-0097/2025 – Jeroen Lenaers – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 29/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0097
Dossier: 2024/0035(COD)
Vote id: 176995

Position: vote 8 of 35 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ECR · split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label: A10-0097/2025 – Jeroen Lenaers – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 29/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0097
Dossier: 2024/0035(COD)
Vote id: 176995

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “religious community leaders”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 42	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 51	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 120	Against 0	Abst. 2	No vote 14 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 63	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 11 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 166	Against 6	Abst. 5	No vote 11 of 188	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.91
ECR	For 19	Against 45	Abst. 9	No vote 6 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.42
Patriots	For 41	Against 27	Abst. 6	No vote 11 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.33
ESN	For 2	Against 8	Abst. 16	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.42
No group	For 14	Against 9	Abst. 4	No vote 3 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	4–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–3	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	2–3–0	0–0–1	no member voted	0–2–1	0–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	3–0–0	2–6–0	0–0–1	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	15–0–0	13–0–0	6–0–0	30–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–14	8–0–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	3–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	2–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	9–0–0	5–0–0	13–0–0	12–0–0	5–1–0	4–0–0	26–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–0–2	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–3
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–1	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	0–8–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	21–0–0	no member voted	5–1–1	0–22–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	6–0–0	0–0–1	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	20–0–3	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	7–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	0–0–2	2–0–1	9–0–0	5–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	4–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–6–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	4	0
Belgium	4	0
Bulgaria	1	0
Cyprus	1	0
Germany	13	0
Denmark	3	0
Estonia	2	0
Spain	19	0
Finland	2	0
France	13	0
Greece	3	0
Croatia	4	0
Hungary	2	0
Ireland	1	0
Italy	21	0
Lithuania	2	0
Luxembourg	1	0
Malta	3	0
Netherlands	4	0
Poland	3	0
Portugal	8	0
Romania	0	2
Sweden	5	0
Slovenia	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Aleksandar NIKOLIC group that day: Patriots · France
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Andi CRISTEA group that day: S&D · Romania
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
András Tivadar KULJA group that day: EPP · Hungary
Andreas GLÜCK group that day: Renew · Germany
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT group that day: Patriots · France
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonella SBERNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Arno BAUSEMER group that day: ESN · Germany
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Caterina CHINNICI group that day: EPP · Italy
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Dan NICA group that day: S&D · Romania
Daniel BUDA group that day: EPP · Romania
Delara BURKHARDT group that day: S&D · Germany
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Emma WIESNER group that day: Renew · Sweden
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Fabienne KELLER group that day: Renew · France
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gheorghe CÂRCIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Hana JALLOUL MURO group that day: S&D · Spain
Hannes HEIDE group that day: S&D · Austria
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER group that day: Renew · Austria
Hermann TERTSCH group that day: Patriots · Spain
Hilde VAUTMANS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA group that day: EPP · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ group that day: Greens · Spain
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Katri KULMUNI group that day: Renew · Finland
Kinga GÁL group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Letizia MORATTI group that day: EPP · Italy
Li ANDERSSON group that day: The Left · Finland
Lynn BOYLAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Maria OHISALO group that day: Greens · Finland
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Monika HOHLMEIER group that day: EPP · Germany
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Patryk JAKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Roberts ZĪLE group that day: ECR · Latvia
Sibylle BERG group that day: No group · Germany
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Ştefan MUŞOIU group that day: S&D · Romania
Sunčana GLAVAK group that day: EPP · Croatia
Svenja HAHN group that day: Renew · Germany
Tamás DEUTSCH group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Ton DIEPEVEEN group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Tsvetelina PENKOVA group that day: S&D · Bulgaria
Victor NEGRESCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI group that day: ECR · Lithuania

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
20 May 2026	Separate vote on citation 11 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response	Separate vote	464 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted	For 74 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.77 573 voters
20 May 2026	Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response	Split vote	463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.77 580 voters
21 May 2026	Paragraph 49 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap	Split vote	421 for, 77 against, 33 abstained Adopted	For 79 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.76 484 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
28 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Split vote	497 for, 108 against, 46 abstained Adopted	For 76 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.76 599 voters
20 May 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 21 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response	Separate vote	465 for, 122 against, 42 abstained Adopted	For 74 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.75 574 voters
28 Apr 2026	Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Split vote	491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted	For 75 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.75 600 voters
8 Jul 2026	Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Split vote	456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.75 585 voters
23 Oct 2024	Paragraph 45 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections	Split vote	495 for, 129 against, 23 abstained Adopted	For 77 %	Requested by Patriots, ECR	r · shared0.75 592 voters
20 May 2026	Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	Split vote	515 for, 112 against, 19 abstained Adopted	For 80 %		r · shared0.74 584 voters
28 Apr 2026	Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Split vote	468 for, 129 against, 55 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.74 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) New EU law · report by Jeroen Lenaers 17 Jun 2025 Passed

Other votes on this decision

Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 1 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 16 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 16 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 29 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 29 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 29 — part 5 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 136 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 138 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 169 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025
Vote Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) — Amendment 184 Roll-call vote · 17 Jun 2025 17 Jun 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 29 — part 2 — Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)”. Vote, 17 June 2025. votingId 176995, reference 2024/0035(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-17-176995,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29 — part 2 — Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176995, reference 2024/0035(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}