Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 21

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 21
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 20 May 2026
Result
465 for · 122 against · 42 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0245/2026 – § 21
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0245
Dossier
2026/2607(RSP)
Vote id
193010
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 465 for, 122 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 139Against 7Abst. 3No vote 34 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 11Against 31Abst. 32No vote 7 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.15
PatriotsFor 30Against 48Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 1Against 25Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece200
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 88

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 88 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 575 voters
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on MontenegroSeparate vote454 for, 143 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 578 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 496 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 499 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.82 521 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 563 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 572 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 505 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 5 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote424 for, 143 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 539 voters
17 Sept 2026Recital AD — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote413 for, 143 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.82 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193010
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 21 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response”. Vote, 20 May 2026. votingId 193010, reference 2026/2607(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193010 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-05-20-193010,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 21 — Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193010}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-05-20/193010},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 193010, reference 2026/2607(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}