Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29 — part 2

Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)

Vote
Amendment 29 — part 2
Result
518 for · 95 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 June 2025, 13:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 35 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0097/2025 – Jeroen Lenaers – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 29/2
Vote id
176995
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 518 for, 95 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “religious community leaders”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 2No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 1No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 166Against 6Abst. 5No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 19Against 45Abst. 9No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
PatriotsFor 41Against 27Abst. 6No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ESNFor 2Against 8Abst. 16No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
No groupFor 14Against 9Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany800
France100
Greece103
Luxembourg001
Poland010
Romania110
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 11 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote464 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 573 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSplit vote463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 580 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 49 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote421 for, 77 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote497 for, 108 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 599 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 21 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote465 for, 122 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.75 574 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 600 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote456 for, 144 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 585 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 45 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote495 for, 129 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.75 592 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote515 for, 112 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.74 584 voters
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote468 for, 129 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 29 — part 2 — Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)”. Vote, 17 June 2025. votingId 176995, reference 2024/0035(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-17-176995,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29 — part 2 — Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-17/176995},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176995, reference 2024/0035(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}