Skip to content

Sitting · Plenary

Thursday 17 September 2026

Date
Thursday 17 September 2026
Part-session
14–17 September 2026 Mon 14Tue 15Wed 16Thu 17
Decisions
10 decisions: 10 passed
Votes
257 votes · 132 roll calls
More facts (5)
Voting time
13:11–13:59
Amendments
79
More

Decisions, 10

Export

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained and how it was recorded. Votes: votes taken on the decision (amendments, split parts, the final vote).
No.DecisionKindEffectFinal voteVotes
No.1 Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted459 for, 12 against, 86 abstained roll callVotes7
No.2 Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained roll callVotes16
No.3 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Committee report by Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero RazzaKindResolutionsAdopted514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained roll callVotes23
No.4 Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted562 for, 1 against, 33 abstained roll callVotes6
No.5 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Committee report by Sandro RuotoloKindResolutionsAdopted395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained roll callVotes13
No.6 The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Committee report by Paulo do Nascimento CabralKindResolutionsAdopted467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained roll callVotes1
No.7 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained roll callVotes27
No.8 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained roll callVotes21
No.9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained roll callVotes138
No.10 Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Motion for a resolutionKindResolutionsAdopted319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained roll callVotes5

All votes, 124

Export

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
17 Sept 2026Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ECR
17 Sept 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECR
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Left
17 Sept 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN
17 Sept 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greens
Show the other 40 votes of this page
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
17 Sept 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Left
17 Sept 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESN
17 Sept 2026Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Left
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 86 %
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 98 %
17 Sept 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 71 %
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersFinal601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 99 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital H Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 98 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upFinal368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by EPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAmendment141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Left
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Greens, The Left
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 96 %Requested by Greens, EPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greens, EPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greens, EPP
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSeparate vote475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greens
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 80 %
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 78 %
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 77 %
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upSplit vote499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 81 %

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Day brief

A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.

AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted resolutions on human rights and media freedom abroad, on healthcare staffing, on young people online, and on fisheries and border security, setting out its positions on a range of international and domestic issues.

  • Media freedom in Hong Kong: MEPs adopted a resolution condemning the use of the National Security Law against journalism and peaceful advocacy, calling for its repeal and for sanctions on those responsible; Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR backed it, while The Left, Patriots and ESN mostly abstained.
  • Political prisoners in Cuba: Parliament called on Cuba to release all people detained for peacefully exercising their rights and to cooperate with the UN human rights office; Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN backed the text, while The Left, Greens and S&D opposed it.
  • EU health workforce crisis: MEPs set out measures to address shortages of doctors, nurses and carers, including better recognition of qualifications, more training and use of EU funds; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots backed it, with ESN opposed.
  • Post-electoral repression in Zambia: Parliament condemned police abuses after the elections and urged Zambia to end arbitrary detention and investigate the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya; all groups listed backed the resolution.
  • Social media and young people: MEPs called for a European strategy on how digital platforms affect children and young adults, covering safety by design, algorithmic transparency, age assurance and digital education; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP backed it, ECR and ESN opposed it, and Patriots mostly abstained.

Report a problem

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

Other sittings of the part-session

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026”. Sitting, 17 September 2026. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2026-09-17,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}