Sitting · Plenary
Thursday 17 September 2026
- Date
- Thursday 17 September 2026
- Decisions
- 10 decisions: 10 passed
- Votes
- 257 votes · 132 roll calls
More facts (5)
- Voting time
- 13:11–13:59
- Amendments
- 79
- Previous sitting
- Wednesday 16 September 2026
- Next sitting
- Monday 5 October 2026
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
| No. | Decision | Kind | Effect | Final vote | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.1 | Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstained roll call | Votes7 |
| No.2 | Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained roll call | Votes16 |
| No.3 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Committee report by Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza | KindResolutions | Adopted | 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained roll call | Votes23 |
| No.4 | Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstained roll call | Votes6 |
| No.5 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Committee report by Sandro Ruotolo | KindResolutions | Adopted | 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained roll call | Votes13 |
| No.6 | The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Committee report by Paulo do Nascimento Cabral | KindResolutions | Adopted | 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained roll call | Votes1 |
| No.7 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained roll call | Votes27 |
| No.8 | Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained roll call | Votes21 |
| No.9 | The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained roll call | Votes138 |
| No.10 | Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained roll call | Votes5 |
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 58 % | Requested by ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 56 % | Requested by ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected | For 33 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained Rejected | For 47 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected | For 33 % | Requested by The Left |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained Adopted | For 73 % | Requested by S&D |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected | For 39 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted | For 45 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained Rejected | For 21 % | Requested by ESN |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained Adopted | For 70 % | Requested by Greens |
Show the other 40 votes of this page
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained Rejected | For 44 % | Requested by The Left |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained Rejected | For 22 % | Requested by ESN |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained Rejected | For 16 % | Requested by The Left |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected | For 34 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 86 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained Adopted | For 71 % | Requested by S&D |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Amendment | 111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained Rejected | For 18 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained Adopted | For 71 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Final | 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 99 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after recital H Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained Rejected | For 33 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained Adopted | For 57 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained Adopted | For 62 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained Rejected | For 34 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Split vote | 512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 84 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Split vote | 602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected | For 35 % | Requested by Patriots, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained Rejected | For 35 % | Requested by Patriots, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained Adopted | For 57 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained Adopted | For 62 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained Rejected | For 30 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained Rejected | For 32 % | Requested by Patriots |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 57 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Amendment | 213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained Rejected | For 35 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Final | 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained Adopted | For 60 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Amendment | 141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained Rejected | For 23 % | Requested by The Left |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Separate vote | 452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained Adopted | For 74 % | Requested by Greens, The Left |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Separate vote | 480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained Adopted | For 78 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained Adopted | For 96 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained Adopted | For 45 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted | For 80 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 12 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Separate vote | 475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 79 % | Requested by Greens |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained Adopted | For 78 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted | For 80 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 78 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained Adopted | For 77 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained Adopted | For 81 % |
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Day brief
A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.
AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted resolutions on human rights and media freedom abroad, on healthcare staffing, on young people online, and on fisheries and border security, setting out its positions on a range of international and domestic issues.
- Media freedom in Hong Kong: MEPs adopted a resolution condemning the use of the National Security Law against journalism and peaceful advocacy, calling for its repeal and for sanctions on those responsible; Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR backed it, while The Left, Patriots and ESN mostly abstained.
- Political prisoners in Cuba: Parliament called on Cuba to release all people detained for peacefully exercising their rights and to cooperate with the UN human rights office; Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN backed the text, while The Left, Greens and S&D opposed it.
- EU health workforce crisis: MEPs set out measures to address shortages of doctors, nurses and carers, including better recognition of qualifications, more training and use of EU funds; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots backed it, with ESN opposed.
- Post-electoral repression in Zambia: Parliament condemned police abuses after the elections and urged Zambia to end arbitrary detention and investigate the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya; all groups listed backed the resolution.
- Social media and young people: MEPs called for a European strategy on how digital platforms affect children and young adults, covering safety by design, algorithmic transparency, age assurance and digital education; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP backed it, ECR and ESN opposed it, and Patriots mostly abstained.
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
Other sittings of the part-session
- Sitting Monday, 14 September 2026 Plenary sitting 14 Sept 2026
- Sitting Tuesday, 15 September 2026 Plenary sitting 15 Sept 2026
- Sitting Wednesday, 16 September 2026 Plenary sitting 16 Sept 2026
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026”. Sitting, 17 September 2026. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2026-09-17,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-09-17},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vpage=2},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}