Sitting · Plenary
Thursday 17 September 2026
- Date
- Thursday 17 September 2026
- Decisions
- 10 decisions: 10 passed
- Votes
- 257 votes · 132 roll calls
More facts (5)
- Voting time
- 13:11–13:59
- Amendments
- 79
- Previous sitting
- Wednesday 16 September 2026
- Next sitting
- Monday 5 October 2026
Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.
| No. | Decision | Kind | Effect | Final vote | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.1 | Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstained roll call | Votes7 |
| No.2 | Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained roll call | Votes16 |
| No.3 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Committee report by Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza | KindResolutions | Adopted | 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained roll call | Votes23 |
| No.4 | Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstained roll call | Votes6 |
| No.5 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Committee report by Sandro Ruotolo | KindResolutions | Adopted | 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained roll call | Votes13 |
| No.6 | The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Committee report by Paulo do Nascimento Cabral | KindResolutions | Adopted | 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained roll call | Votes1 |
| No.7 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained roll call | Votes27 |
| No.8 | Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained roll call | Votes21 |
| No.9 | The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained roll call | Votes138 |
| No.10 | Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Motion for a resolution | KindResolutions | Adopted | 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained roll call | Votes5 |
Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained Adopted | For 66 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained Adopted | For 58 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital F — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 91 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained Adopted | For 60 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 12 — part 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 74 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 71 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained Adopted | For 59 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 60 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained Adopted | For 65 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained Adopted | For 86 % |
Show the other 19 votes of this page
| Date | Vote | Kind | Result | For | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | Split vote | 435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained Adopted | For 71 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Split vote | 512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 84 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | Split vote | 602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained Adopted | For 98 % | Requested by EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained Adopted | For 96 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained Adopted | For 45 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained Adopted | For 80 % | Requested by Greens, EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained Adopted | For 78 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained Adopted | For 80 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 5 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained Adopted | For 78 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained Adopted | For 77 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained Adopted | For 81 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained Adopted | For 76 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up | Split vote | 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained Adopted | For 79 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital AD — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Split vote | 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstained Adopted | For 68 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Recital AD — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Split vote | 575 for, 13 against, 19 abstained Adopted | For 95 % | |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Split vote | 403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained Adopted | For 67 % | Requested by Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 85 — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Split vote | 449 for, 100 against, 62 abstained Adopted | For 73 % | Requested by Renew |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 63 — part 3 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Split vote | 401 for, 181 against, 29 abstained Adopted | For 66 % |
Open these votes in the register to filter them further.
Day brief
A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.
AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament adopted resolutions on human rights and media freedom abroad, on healthcare staffing, on young people online, and on fisheries and border security, setting out its positions on a range of international and domestic issues.
- Media freedom in Hong Kong: MEPs adopted a resolution condemning the use of the National Security Law against journalism and peaceful advocacy, calling for its repeal and for sanctions on those responsible; Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR backed it, while The Left, Patriots and ESN mostly abstained.
- Political prisoners in Cuba: Parliament called on Cuba to release all people detained for peacefully exercising their rights and to cooperate with the UN human rights office; Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN backed the text, while The Left, Greens and S&D opposed it.
- EU health workforce crisis: MEPs set out measures to address shortages of doctors, nurses and carers, including better recognition of qualifications, more training and use of EU funds; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots backed it, with ESN opposed.
- Post-electoral repression in Zambia: Parliament condemned police abuses after the elections and urged Zambia to end arbitrary detention and investigate the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya; all groups listed backed the resolution.
- Social media and young people: MEPs called for a European strategy on how digital platforms affect children and young adults, covering safety by design, algorithmic transparency, age assurance and digital education; The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP backed it, ECR and ESN opposed it, and Patriots mostly abstained.
Connections
The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.
Other sittings of the part-session
- Sitting Monday, 14 September 2026 Plenary sitting 14 Sept 2026
- Sitting Tuesday, 15 September 2026 Plenary sitting 15 Sept 2026
- Sitting Wednesday, 16 September 2026 Plenary sitting 16 Sept 2026
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026”. Sitting, 17 September 2026. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vkind=split (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-sitting-2026-09-17,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Sitting of Thursday 17 September 2026}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-09-17},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vkind=split}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2026-09-17?vkind=split},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}