Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member · Former member

Bas EICKHOUT

Greens · Netherlands · left on 20 June 2026

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
89.9 %ⓘ of 5 283 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
99.3 %ⓘ of 4 751 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (4)
National party
GL-PvdA GroenLinks-PvdA
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 20 Jun 2026 (left on 20 June 2026)
Against clear line
11 of 4 659 votesⓘ
Member id
96725
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

89.9 %

4 751 of 5 283 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (−2.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.3 %

4 717 of 4 751 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (+2.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.2 %

11 of 4 659 votes where their group had a clear line

7 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.1 %

195 of 4 751 votes cast

Participation 89.9 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Bas EICKHOUT89.9 %
Greens median92.2 %
Lowest in the group48.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members54
With majority line 99.3 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Bas EICKHOUT99.3 %
Greens median97.1 %
Lowest in the group87.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 283

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 136 for, 487 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 191 for, 423 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 79 for, 561 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 81 for, 518 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 78 for, 528 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Final votePassed 503 for, 57 against, 108 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 224 for, 424 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 362 for, 259 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 259 to recital 4 197 for, 454 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 227 for, 299 against, 138 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 187 to Article 23 527 for, 121 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 178 to Article 22 529 for, 120 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 170 to Article 21 525 for, 123 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 250 to Article 16, after paragraph 2 141 for, 516 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 325 for, 284 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 164 450 for, 205 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 163 528 for, 123 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 162 494 for, 152 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 159 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 158 492 for, 159 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Proposal to reject the text 44 for, 600 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 438 for, 37 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on recital H 455 for, 88 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 54 for, 483 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 9 86 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 429 for, 76 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 2 441 for, 94 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 1 451 for, 43 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 385 for, 97 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 450 for, 93 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 219 for, 337 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 204 for, 359 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 227 for, 346 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 227 for, 348 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 196 for, 367 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 217 for, 365 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 386 for, 184 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 6, adding text after recital G 189 for, 376 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 5, adding text after recital G 187 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 4, adding text after recital F 181 for, 384 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 3, adding text after recital C 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 1, adding text after recital B 200 for, 382 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 183 for, 388 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 12 of 99 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249290
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 2024570
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254544
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253029
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228226
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253534
2 Apr 2025251246
3 Apr 20256258
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220214
8 May 2025103102
21 May 202520
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202521
17 Jun 20254140
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255553
9 Jul 2025134128
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101100
10 Sept 20253433
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186183
23 Oct 2025550
13 Nov 2025267266
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510099
27 Nov 2025125124
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256665
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112111
22 Jan 20265856
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141140
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197191
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225219
29 Apr 2026296292
30 Apr 20266867
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269696
21 May 2026980
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 2026400
17 Jun 20261270
18 Jun 2026770

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium99 % of 4 028 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 3 918 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland99 % of 3 931 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany98 % of 4 456 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany98 % of 4 697 shared94 %
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany98 % of 4 358 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany98 % of 4 711 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany98 % of 4 507 shared94 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands98 % of 4 687 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 3 784 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 048 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 195 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 626 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 732 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 291 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands87 % of 4 298 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 3 455 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany87 % of 3 921 shared83 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance87 % of 4 603 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 23 on behalf of their group; 69 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
11 Feb 2026Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 4 minRead
27 Nov 2025Outcome of the UN Climate Change Conference - Belém (COP30) (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
13 Nov 2025Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
22 Oct 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Oct 2025Request for waiver of immunity Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 29 October 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 as regards technical provisions, long-term guarantee measures, own funds, equity risk, spread risk on securitisation positions, other standard formula capital requirements, reporting and disclosure, proportionality and group solvency B-10-2026-0056Motion for a resolution—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
11 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 4 July 2025 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards the simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486 as regards simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives B-10-2025-0566Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
9 Dec 2025Committee for Socio-economic Analysis opinion delays and implications for the adoption of the EU-wide PFAS restriction E-10-2025-004861Written questionwith 9 co-authors16 Feb 2026
23 Oct 2025Sliding scale for steel (Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the proposed industrial decarbonisation accelerator act) E-10-2025-004184Written questionwith 18 co-authors19 Dec 2025
26 Sept 2025Energy dimension of the EU-US trade deal E-10-2025-003743Written questionwith 17 co-authors4 Dec 2025
8 Jul 2025PFAS limits and TFA in drinking water P-10-2025-002764Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors22 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025Enabling a financial framework to support the circular economy in the EU E-10-2025-002292Written questionwith 16 co-authors18 Aug 2025
5 Jun 2025Protecting retail investors against predatory investment firms selling misleading financial products offering poor value for money E-10-2025-002287Written question31 Jul 2025

Show all 12 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
11 Nov 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2025 ECON-AM-779370 ECON46
20 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ECON-AM-773048 ECON63
11 Dec 20242023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Commission ENVI-AM-766861 ENVI1
13 Nov 2024European Central Bank – annual report 2024 ECON-AM-765337 ECON34

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?amendments=all&page=38&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bas EICKHOUT”. Member record. memberId 96725. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?amendments=all&page=38&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96725?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-96725,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bas EICKHOUT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?amendments=all&page=38&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?amendments=all&page=38&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96725. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}