Skip to content

Member

Manfred WEBER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
81.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.0 %ⓘ of 508 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
2 of 473 votesⓘ
Member id
28229
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.9 %

508 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−8.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.0 %

503 of 508 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 473 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 508 votes cast

Participation 81.9 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Manfred WEBER81.9 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 99.0 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Manfred WEBER99.0 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Final votePassed 503 for, 57 against, 108 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 247, adding text after recital 22 224 for, 424 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 362 for, 259 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 259 to recital 4 197 for, 454 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 227 for, 299 against, 138 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 187 to Article 23 527 for, 121 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 178 to Article 22 529 for, 120 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 170 to Article 21 525 for, 123 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 250 to Article 16, after paragraph 2 141 for, 516 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 325 for, 284 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 164 450 for, 205 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 163 528 for, 123 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 162 494 for, 152 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 159 517 for, 127 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Amendment 158 492 for, 159 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest Proposal to reject the text 44 for, 600 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 438 for, 37 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on recital H 455 for, 88 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 54 for, 483 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 9 86 for, 463 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 429 for, 76 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 2 441 for, 94 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Paragraph 7 — part 1 451 for, 43 against, 65 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 385 for, 97 against, 78 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 450 for, 93 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 77 219 for, 337 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 6 to paragraph 61 204 for, 359 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 227 for, 346 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 4 to paragraph 42 227 for, 348 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 196 for, 367 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 217 for, 365 against, 1 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 386 for, 184 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 6, adding text after recital G 189 for, 376 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 5, adding text after recital G 187 for, 377 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 4, adding text after recital F 181 for, 384 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 3, adding text after recital C 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 1, adding text after recital B 200 for, 382 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 183 for, 388 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 170 for, 386 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 40 414 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Separate vote on paragraph 39 411 for, 152 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 179 for, 396 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Dec 2025Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 18 199 for, 372 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 15 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany99 % of 2 852 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany99 % of 4 200 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany99 % of 3 795 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany99 % of 4 567 shared89 %
Lena DÜPONT EPPGermany99 % of 4 098 shared89 %
Andrea WECHSLER EPPGermany99 % of 4 481 shared89 %
Stefan KÖHLER EPPGermany99 % of 4 286 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany99 % of 4 182 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany99 % of 4 620 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany99 % of 4 306 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia90 % of 4 221 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania89 % of 4 044 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania89 % of 3 370 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland89 % of 3 629 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium89 % of 4 474 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland88 % of 4 563 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany88 % of 3 124 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany88 % of 4 489 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium88 % of 4 174 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 470 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 26 on behalf of their group; 127 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
7 Jul 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Jun 2026Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 4 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 5 minRead
11 Feb 2026Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 4 minRead
21 Jan 2026European Council meeting (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 6 minRead
15 Dec 2025Order of business on behalf of EPPSpeech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate) Speech · 3 minRead

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770Written questionwith 20 co-authors17 Dec 2024
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
26 Mar 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 as regards certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countries AGRI-AM-785380 AGRI8

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Manfred WEBER”. Member record. memberId 28229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28229?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-28229,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Manfred WEBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28229. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}