Skip to content

Member

Marko VEŠLIGAJ

S&D · Croatia

Group
S&D
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
76.7 %ⓘ of 619 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.6 %ⓘ of 475 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SDP Socijaldemokratska partija Hrvatske
In office
Since 5 Sept 2024
Against clear line
13 of 471 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), FEMM (vice-chair), REGI (substitute)
Member id
260035
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.7 %

475 of 619 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−12.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.6 %

459 of 475 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.8 %

13 of 471 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.7 %

13 of 475 votes cast

Participation 76.7 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marko VEŠLIGAJ76.7 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 96.6 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marko VEŠLIGAJ96.6 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 904

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 8 to recital AJ 221 for, 426 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI 218 for, 419 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital AC — part 2 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Separate vote on recital U 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 6 to recital Q 236 for, 425 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital G — part 2 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 222 for, 429 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 431 for, 223 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 15 — part 2 253 for, 165 against, 214 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 234 for, 423 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 11 — part 2 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 224 for, 404 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 1 150 for, 474 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 415 for, 105 against, 142 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 128 against, 104 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Separate vote on paragraph 41 336 for, 288 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 201 for, 462 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 426 for, 140 against, 107 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 202 for, 461 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 2 to recital A 191 for, 467 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 22 462 for, 128 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 160 for, 464 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 21 510 for, 148 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 463 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 152 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 145 for, 519 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 79 for, 557 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 440 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver Final vote — text as a wholePassed 602 for, 47 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 560 for, 75 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 423 for, 57 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Proposal to vote on amendments 135 for, 468 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to vote on amendments 120 for, 509 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East 336 for, 86 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 12 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F 243 for, 211 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 10, adding text after recital E 87 for, 353 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 164 for, 288 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 300 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 167 for, 294 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 3 313 for, 94 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 2 303 for, 165 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 1 323 for, 97 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 14 of 79 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Biljana BORZAN S&DCroatia97 % of 4 385 shared93 %
Romana JERKOVIĆ S&DCroatia97 % of 3 491 shared93 %
Tonino PICULA S&DCroatia95 % of 4 450 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain92 % of 3 025 shared93 %
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain91 % of 3 759 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain91 % of 3 870 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain91 % of 3 883 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany90 % of 3 483 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly90 % of 4 431 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly90 % of 3 336 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia85 % of 3 865 shared83 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands85 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany84 % of 4 169 shared83 %
Sergey LAGODINSKY GreensGermany84 % of 3 435 shared83 %
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia84 % of 4 304 shared86 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany84 % of 4 215 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands84 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Jutta PAULUS GreensGermany84 % of 4 039 shared83 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany84 % of 4 499 shared83 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands84 % of 3 750 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute13 Sept 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeVice-chair14 Oct 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeSubstitute15 Dec 2025now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Dec 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Sept 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS7 Jul 2026
Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agricultureRapporteurAGRI16 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS21 May 2026
As a member of the delegation he will be participating in an official mission of said delegation.Official delegationDACP5 May 2026
First Caribbean Regional Parliamentary Assembly Official delegationDPAC14 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS2 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsFEMM18 Jul 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldShadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM8 Apr 2025
Gender Equality Strategy 2025RapporteurCONT13 Feb 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairFEMM14 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
14 Sept 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Harnessing the potential of a competitive and sustainable EU Bioeconomy Strategy for EU strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
6 Jul 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
18 May 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 27

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products E-10-2026-002960Written question18 Aug 2026
30 Jun 2026Fertiliser action plan E-10-2026-002704Written question7 Aug 2026
7 May 2026EU-Mercosur agreement: exposure of the European market to the JBS Group and the risks of geoeconomic dependence in agricultural supply chains E-10-2026-001890Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jun 2026
22 Apr 2026Digital literacy for farmers E-10-2026-001656Written question18 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026EU – Mercosur agreement P-10-2026-001429Priority written question11 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Commission’s participation in US Board of Peace meeting on Gaza E-10-2026-001240Written questionwith 7 co-authors8 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026Impact of the Middle East crisis on EU farmers, input costs and food supply chains P-10-2026-001169Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors13 May 2026
11 Mar 2026The Commission’s next steps regarding the proposal to establish a European housing agency E-10-2026-001021Written question1 Jun 2026
23 Feb 2026Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications for midwives E-10-2026-000753Written question7 Apr 2026

Show all 27 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI10
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI23
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI52
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI17
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI9

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marko VEŠLIGAJ”. Member record. memberId 260035. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/260035?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-260035,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marko VEŠLIGAJ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 260035. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}