Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 17, after paragraph 32

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 17, after paragraph 32
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
168 for · 447 against · 46 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 32 – Am 17
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196349
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 447 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 10Against 35Abst. 2No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.62
S&DFor 3Against 123Abst. 0No vote 9 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 2Against 72Abst. 0No vote 4 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 2Against 170Abst. 0No vote 12 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 12Against 35Abst. 29No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.19
PatriotsFor 58Against 6Abst. 11No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 22Against 2Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 20Against 4Abst. 2No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany200
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France700
Greece300
Ireland200
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaAmendment159 for, 396 against, 90 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 602 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 608 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.80 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
24 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment119 for, 428 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ECR, The Leftr · shared0.80 541 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 592 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudAmendment110 for, 451 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 555 voters
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – AustraliaOther134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.78 465 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 613 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaAmendment139 for, 431 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 555 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment131 for, 492 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196349
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 17, after paragraph 32 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196349, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196349 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196349,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 17, after paragraph 32 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196349}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196349},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196349, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}