Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 51 — part 2 to paragraph 80

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Vote
Amendment 51 — part 2 to paragraph 80
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 15 Sept 2026
Result
209 for · 447 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 September 2026, 13:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 76 of 139 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0199
Dossier
2025/2069(INI)
Vote id
196380
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 447 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 72Abst. 0No vote 6 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 15Against 151Abst. 0No vote 18 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 27Against 0Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 11Abst. 2No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany020
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France070
Greece030
Ireland030
Italy0100
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 521 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment199 for, 391 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 644 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 466 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 612 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 24 to recital 23 Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movementAmendment208 for, 465 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 619 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 601 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 68 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment195 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 601 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAmendment179 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 535 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 603 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196380
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 51 — part 2 to paragraph 80 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield”. Vote, 15 September 2026. votingId 196380, reference 2025/2069(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196380 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-15-196380,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 51 — part 2 to paragraph 80 — Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196380}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-15/196380},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196380, reference 2025/2069(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}