Skip to content

Member

Gheorghe CÂRCIU

S&D · Romania

Group
S&D
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
59.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
93.0 %ⓘ of 371 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
23 of 366 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
257100
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

59.8 %

371 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−29.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.0 %

345 of 371 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−4.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.3 %

23 of 366 votes where their group had a clear line

19 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

6 of 371 votes cast

Participation 59.8 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Gheorghe CÂRCIU59.8 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 93.0 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Gheorghe CÂRCIU93.0 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 462 for, 76 against, 106 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 14, adding text after recital P 186 for, 470 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 25 to recital P 197 for, 455 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 24 to recital N 182 for, 455 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 23 to recital M 217 for, 444 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 22 to recital K 219 for, 440 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 2 344 for, 297 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 1 497 for, 136 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 39 to recital F 231 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 38 to recital D 224 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 21 to recital D 194 for, 458 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 31 207 for, 451 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 31 — part 2 460 for, 149 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 33 to paragraph 31 193 for, 437 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 28 — part 2 303 for, 299 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 19 to paragraph 27 206 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 32 to paragraph 27 235 for, 406 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 376 for, 236 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 220 for, 373 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 185 for, 475 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 22 120 for, 475 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 13 205 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 7 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 31 to paragraph 7 122 for, 450 against, 93 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 173 for, 461 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 247 for, 409 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 29 to paragraph 5 115 for, 462 against, 91 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 235 for, 389 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 4 96 for, 389 against, 174 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 205 for, 447 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 135 for, 468 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 1 234 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 8, adding text before paragraph 1 41 for, 506 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 1, adding text after recital T 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 32, adding text after recital P 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 25, adding text after recital J 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 24, adding text after recital E 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 22, adding text after recital E 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 99 to recital A 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 73 — part 1 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 2 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 1 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 33 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania99 % of 2 439 shared93 %
Claudiu MANDA S&DRomania99 % of 1 917 shared93 %
Mihai TUDOSE S&DRomania97 % of 2 279 shared93 %
Ştefan MUŞOIU S&DRomania97 % of 3 036 shared93 %
Gabriela FIREA S&DRomania97 % of 2 503 shared93 %
Victor NEGRESCU S&DRomania97 % of 3 127 shared93 %
Andi CRISTEA S&DRomania97 % of 3 133 shared93 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania95 % of 2 318 shared93 %
Vasile DÎNCU S&DRomania95 % of 3 196 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania94 % of 3 225 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly90 % of 801 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania88 % of 3 206 shared86 %
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER RenewAustria87 % of 2 771 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia87 % of 3 060 shared86 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium87 % of 2 204 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg87 % of 3 154 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium87 % of 2 524 shared86 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 3 055 shared86 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 2 841 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance86 % of 3 271 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA DelegationVice-chair9 Jul 2025now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Mar 2026now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Wine, Quality Foodstuffs and SpiritsIG10-28 Intergroup / working groupMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA DelegationMember19 Sept 20248 Jul 2025

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI8 Sept 2026
Amending Council Directive 98/58/EC and Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification and strengthening of food and feed safety requirements, and repealing Council Directives 82/711/EEC and 85/572/EECShadow rapporteurAGRI17 Apr 2026
Amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 852/2004, (EC) No 853/2004, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1099/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) 2017/625 as regards the simplification and strengthening of food and feed safety requirementsShadow rapporteurAGRI17 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI17 Jul 2025
I would be shadow rapporteur for AGRI decision ”Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed” and I will negotiate on behalf of S &D and Romania's priorities with other political groups.Shadow rapporteurAGRI14 Nov 2024
No dossier namedDelegation vice-chairDEEA26 Sept 2024

Show all 6 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

No speech or statement in plenary recorded this term.

Questions and motions, 5

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Show all 5 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 2

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Jun 2026on general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 – all sections AGRI-AM-790051 AGRI14
26 Sept 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections BUDG-AM-778084 BUDG1

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Gheorghe CÂRCIU”. Member record. memberId 257100. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257100?page=102&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257100. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257100?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257100,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Gheorghe CÂRCIU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257100?page=102&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257100?page=102&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257100. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257100. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}