Skip to content

Decision

2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye

Effect
Adopted
Result
367 for · 74 against · 188 abstained roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 14:21–14:32
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a clear majority
Source
Committee report by Nacho Sánchez Amor
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
82 votes · 34 roll calls · 26 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · S&D (2 split votes) · Renew (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call, 7 split votes) · Patriots (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ESN (1 roll call, 4 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
175396
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 367 for, 74 against, 188 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 26 amendments (12 adopted, 14 rejected) and 55 parts of the text voted on separately (32 adopted, 12 rejected, 11 lapsed).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots; The Left, ECR and ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 0Abst. 33No vote 7 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 1No vote 19 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 129Against 1Abst. 33No vote 25 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 1Against 3Abst. 67No vote 9 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 57Abst. 26No vote 2 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
ESNFor 0Against 3Abst. 19No vote 4 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 4Against 10Abst. 6No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Voted against their group, 77

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria130610.53
Belgium123340.50
Bulgaria80540.42
Cyprus1050—
Czechia531210.40
Germany56618160.55
Denmark101220.65
Estonia4003—
Spain406590.68
Finland120031.00
France24341490.21
Greece1011000.21
Croatia90120.85
Hungary111630.42
Ireland110210.77
Italy3203950.32
Lithuania70310.55
Luxembourg4011—
Latvia4122—
Malta5001—
Netherlands226120.64
Poland504080.83
Portugal150330.75
Romania231630.65
Sweden180300.79
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia81150.70

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&DSpeeches37 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Jordan BARDELLA FrancePatriotsSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Davor Ivo STIER CroatiaEPPSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jonas SJÖSTEDT SwedenThe LeftSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Geadis GEADI CyprusECRSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Show the other 36 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Costas MAVRIDES CyprusS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Elissavet VOZEMBERG-VRIONIDI GreeceEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS GreeceEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Kostas PAPADAKIS GreeceNo groupSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESNSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Evin INCIR SwedenS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Loucas FOURLAS CyprusEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Giorgos GEORGIOU CyprusThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Isabel WISELER-LIMA LuxembourgEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Özlem DEMIREL GermanyThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Silvia SARDONE ItalyPatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Andreas SCHIEDER AustriaS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Tineke STRIK NetherlandsGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Malik AZMANI NetherlandsRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Emmanouil FRAGKOS GreeceECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Reinhold LOPATKA AustriaEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vladimir PREBILIČ SloveniaGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group GreeceS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Yannis MANIATIS GreeceS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group CzechiaECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Matthieu VALET FrancePatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Mélissa CAMARA FranceGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Vivien COSTANZO GermanyS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU GreecePatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo groupSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Sebastian EVERDING GermanyThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michalis HADJIPANTELA CyprusEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Fidias PANAYIOTOU CyprusNo groupSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lucia YAR SlovakiaRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Beatrice TIMGREN SwedenECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Younous OMARJEE FranceThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 82

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 39 to paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 1 – Am 39 Roll call121 for, 459 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
2Amendment 6 to paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 1 – Am 6 Roll call395 for, 126 against, 97 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 20 Roll call138 for, 474 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Show the other 81 votesShow the other 79 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 6 to paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 1 – Am 6 Roll call395 for, 126 against, 97 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 20 Roll call138 for, 474 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 21/1 Part voted on: “Stresses that Türkiye is not a European country”Roll call138 for, 485 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN
5Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 21/2 Part voted on: “and should therefore not become a member of the EU;”Roll call135 for, 468 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN
6Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 3 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 21/3 Part voted on: “recommends that alternatives to accession be identified to enable mutually beneficial cooperation between the EU and Türkiye;”Roll call116 for, 495 against, 23 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN; split: ESN
7Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 1 – Am 22 Roll call118 for, 446 against, 65 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
8Separate vote on paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
9Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 6 – Am 40 Roll call224 for, 374 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
10Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘urges the Turkish authorities to refrain from reintroducing a similar overly broad and vague law in the future, given the serious risk that it would be used as a tool to further criminalise the legitimate activities of civil society organisations within the country;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ESN
11Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ESN
12Amendment 1 to paragraph 15 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 15 – Am 1 Roll call575 for, 33 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
13Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 15 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 15 – Am 2 Roll call569 for, 4 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
14Separate vote on paragraph 16 Show of hands Lapsed
15Separate vote on paragraph 18 Show of hands Adopted
16Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 18 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 18 – Am 44 Roll call424 for, 183 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
17Amendment 3 to paragraph 19 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 19 – Am 3 Roll call480 for, 105 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
18Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 21 – Am 7/1 Part voted on: ‘regrets the EU’s lack of a strong, unified response to these alarming developments;’Roll call393 for, 182 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: S&D
19Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 21 – Am 7/2 Part voted on: ‘strongly criticises the decision to proceed with the first EU-Türkiye High-Level Economic Dialogue since 2019 on 3 April 2025, despite these deeply troubling developments, and deplores the absence of clear conditionality tied to the release of İmamoğlu and detained journalists, which seriously undermines the EU’s credibility and commitment to democratic values; urges the Commission, therefore, to develop, without delay, a comprehensive toolbox of political and economic measures, to be enacted swiftly and decisively in the event of further democratic backsliding in Türkiye;’Roll call216 for, 330 against, 76 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: S&D
20Separate vote on paragraph 21 Counted357 for, 263 against, 14 abstained Adopted
21Separate vote on paragraph 21 Show of hands Adopted
22Amendment 8 to paragraph 23 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 23 – Am 8 Roll call554 for, 7 against, 73 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
23Separate vote on paragraph 23 Show of hands Rejected
24Paragraph 24 — part 1 of 6 Part voted on: ‘Strongly condemns the ongoing violations and lack of protection of the fundamental rights of‘Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
25Paragraph 24 — part 2 of 6 Part voted on: “LGBTI+ persons”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
26Paragraph 24 — part 3 of 6 Part voted on: “in Türkiye, including the increased incidence of hate speech, hate crimes and discriminatory rhetoric, as well as continued media stereotyping”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
27Paragraph 24 — part 4 of 6 Part voted on: “based on sexual orientation and gender identity;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
28Paragraph 24 — part 5 of 6 Part voted on: “deplores the fact that this continued discrimination is often sanctioned by the authorities,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
29Paragraph 24 — part 6 of 6 Part voted on: “as evidenced by the mass arrests made during the Pride March in 2023 and the banning of the march in 2024, while anti-LGBTI+ marches were permitted; urges the Turkish authorities to stop banning activities against homophobia, including Pride marches, with immediate effect;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR; separate: ESN
30Vote on text inserted after paragraph 23 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
31Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 23 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 23 – Am 25 Roll call153 for, 394 against, 77 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
32Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 25 – Am 41 Roll call195 for, 386 against, 21 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
33Vote on text inserted after paragraph 25 Show of hands Rejected
34Separate vote on paragraph 28 Show of hands Adopted
35Separate vote on paragraph 28 Show of hands Lapsed
36Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 28 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After § 28 – Am 4 Roll call105 for, 467 against, 63 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
37Paragraph 29 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Regrets the fact that the Cyprus problem remains unresolved, and calls for serious reengagement and the political will of all parties involved to bring about peaceful UN-led negotiations, with a view to achieving real progress in the Cyprus settlement talks; welcomes the resumption of informal talks under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General on 18 and 19 March 2025, which were held in a constructive atmosphere in which both sides showed a clear commitment to making progress and continuing dialogue;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
38Paragraph 29 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “welcomes the agreement between both sides on opening four crossing points, demining, establishing a youth affairs committee and launching environmental and solar energy projects, as part of a new set of confidence-building measures; encourages all sides to use this momentum to move towards the resumption of negotiations;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
39Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
40Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: ECR
41Separate vote on paragraph 30 Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: ECR
42Paragraph 31 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates its call for cooperation among the Republic of Cyprus, Türkiye, the United Kingdom and the UN to implement concrete measures for a demilitarisation of the buffer zone, and to improve security on the island;’ and ‘and the Turkish Cypriot leadership’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
43Paragraph 31 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
44Vote on text inserted after paragraph 31 Show of hands Adopted
45Paragraph 32 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates its call on the Commission to step up its efforts to engage with the Turkish Cypriot community, with a view to facilitating the resolution of the Cyprus problem and recalling that its place is in the European Union; calls for all parties involved to demonstrate a more courageous approach to bringing the communities together;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
46Paragraph 32 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
47Separate vote on paragraph 33 Show of hands Adopted
48Separate vote on paragraph 36 Show of hands Rejected
49Paragraph 37 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and welcomes the progress achieved so far; welcomes the continued efforts to restore links between the two countries; urges Türkiye to ensure the speedy implementation of agreements reached by the Turkish and Armenian Governments’ special representatives, such as the opening of the airspace and the border between the two countries for the third country nationals, and, subsequently, for holders of diplomatic passports;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
50Paragraph 37 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
51Paragraph 39 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘notably by failing to align with EU sanctions against Russia’ and ‘urges Türkiye to align with and fully implement the EU sanctions against Russia, including on anti-circumvention measures and to cooperate closely with the EU’s Sanctions Envoy;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ESN
52Paragraph 39 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “notably by failing to align with EU sanctions against Russia,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ESN
53Paragraph 39 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: ‘urges Türkiye to align with and fully implement the EU sanctions against Russia, including on anti-circumvention measures and to cooperate closely with the EU’s Sanctions Envoy;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ESN
54Separate vote on paragraph 42 Show of hands Rejected
55Amendment 27 to paragraph 43 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 43 – Am 27 Roll call146 for, 443 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
56Separate vote on paragraph 43 Show of hands Rejected
57Separate vote on paragraph 46 Show of hands Rejected
58Vote on text inserted after paragraph 46 Show of hands Rejected
59Amendment 10 to paragraph 49 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 49 – Am 10 Roll call461 for, 55 against, 112 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
60Paragraph 49 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Reiterates its firm conviction that, beyond the currently frozen accession process, Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance, a key partner for the stability of the wider region and plays an important role in addressing security challenges, migration management, counterterrorism, and energy security; stresses the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual strategic interest; points to a number of policy areas for future engagement, whether it be the green transition, trade, energy,”Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: Patriots
61Paragraph 49 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “a modernised customs union and visa liberalisation, among others;”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested bysplit: Patriots
62Paragraph 49 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “reaffirms that the EU is committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye, based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust, in line with international law and good neighbourly relations;”Show of hands LapsedRequested bysplit: Patriots
63Amendment 11 to paragraph 50 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 50 – Am 11 Roll call348 for, 204 against, 69 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
64Separate vote on paragraph 50 Show of hands Lapsed
65Paragraph 51 — part 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 51/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Green Deal alignment for green energy policies,’”Roll call476 for, 88 against, 50 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ESN
66Paragraph 51 — part 2 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 51/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ESN
67Amendment 12 to paragraph 52 — part 1 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 52 – Am 12/1 Part voted on: “regrets, however, the poor oversight on the part of the Commission, exemplified by the Erasmus partnership with Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University, whose leadership publicly expressed support for terrorist acts;”Roll call409 for, 157 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: S&D
68Amendment 12 to paragraph 52 — part 2 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 52 – Am 12/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to ensure that partner universities respect the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights by conducting ex ante verifications and regular controls;”Roll call557 for, 15 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: S&D
69Paragraph 52 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘recognises, however, the political commitment to improving access to visas and calls for intensified efforts on both sides to address the remaining technical and administrative barriers; calls on the EU Member states to increase the resources allocated to this matter; supports measures on visa facilitation, particularly with regard to business activities and Erasmus students;’”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR
70Paragraph 52 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained LapsedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR
71Separate vote on paragraph 53 Show of hands RejectedRequested byseparate: ESN
72Separate vote on paragraph 53 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: ESN
73Amendment 13 to paragraph 54 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 54 – Am 13 Roll call493 for, 84 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
74Separate vote on paragraph 57 A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – § 57 Roll call441 for, 131 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
75Amendment 37, adding text after recital K A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After recital K – Am 37 Roll call160 for, 436 against, 27 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
76Amendment 38, adding text after recital K A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – After recital K – Am 38 Roll call170 for, 410 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
77Separate vote on recital L Show of hands Rejected
78Separate vote on recital M Show of hands Rejected
79Vote on text inserted after recital Q Counted316 for, 248 against, 67 abstained Adopted
80Separate vote on recital R Show of hands Rejected
81Separate vote on recital T Show of hands Adopted
82Final vote — text as a whole A10-0067/2025 – Nacho Sánchez Amor – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call367 for, 74 against, 188 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, ECR, Patriots, ESN · split votes by S&D (2), ECR (7), Patriots, ESN (4) · separate votes by ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0067

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye, assessing the country's EU accession progress and broader EU-Türkiye relations.

The resolution notes that accession negotiations have been at a standstill since 2018 and that Türkiye's gap with EU values and norms remains unaddressed.

It calls on Turkish authorities to end restrictions on fundamental rights and urges work towards a closer, strategic partnership beyond the frozen accession process.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution responds to the Commission's 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye, covering accession progress and EU-Türkiye relations.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2023(INI) · Own-initiative report

2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye

Parliament adopted the text on 7 May 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 9 April 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 15 April 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 7 May 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: AFET · Author: Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 19 connections: Running issue: Türkiye · Running issue: EU enlargement · Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Türkiye

Running issue: EU enlargement

Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on AFET dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye”. Decision, 7 May 2025. votingId 175396, document A-10-2025-0067, reference 2025/2023(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/18 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-07-18,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/18}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/18},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 175396, document A-10-2025-0067, reference 2025/2023(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}