Skip to content

Member

Piotr MÜLLER

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
83.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
87.5 %ⓘ of 512 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
11 of 420 votesⓘ
Committees
IMCO, PECH (substitute)
Member id
257080
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

83.2 %

516 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−8.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

87.5 %

448 of 512 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−0.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.6 %

11 of 420 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.6 %

70 of 516 votes cast

Participation 83.2 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Piotr MÜLLER83.2 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 87.5 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Piotr MÜLLER87.5 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37 119 for, 484 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 37 — part 2 469 for, 130 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 39 to paragraph 35 123 for, 476 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 34 — part 2 449 for, 163 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 6 428 for, 151 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 5 443 for, 153 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 4 451 for, 165 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 32 483 for, 106 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 31 — part 2 440 for, 157 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 2 452 for, 86 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 1 565 for, 46 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29 105 for, 501 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 120 for, 459 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 29 102 for, 497 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 29 108 for, 484 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 3 498 for, 97 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 2 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 1 558 for, 47 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 33 to paragraph 29 127 for, 487 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28 153 for, 432 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 137 for, 478 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 28 449 for, 129 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 32 to paragraph 28 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 106 for, 486 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27 135 for, 479 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26 114 for, 482 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25 139 for, 448 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 98 for, 513 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 3 444 for, 164 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 1 558 for, 40 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 30 to paragraph 23 120 for, 472 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 22 77 for, 523 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 6 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 4 461 for, 127 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 2 489 for, 122 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 28 to paragraph 22 121 for, 476 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 4 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 2 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 1 499 for, 105 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 1 189 for, 405 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20 103 for, 488 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 119 for, 485 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 111 for, 494 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20 118 for, 492 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 193 for, 404 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK ECRPoland99 % of 4 909 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland99 % of 4 551 shared81 %
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland98 % of 5 004 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland98 % of 4 930 shared81 %
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 4 975 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland98 % of 5 013 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland98 % of 4 229 shared81 %
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI ECRPoland98 % of 3 509 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 4 876 shared81 %
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI ECRPoland98 % of 4 439 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 4 825 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 777 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 682 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 491 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain74 % of 5 017 shared68 %
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former memberPatriotsCzechia74 % of 1 033 shared68 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 4 493 shared67 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain73 % of 3 785 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain73 % of 3 841 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia73 % of 4 338 shared62 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationSubstitute26 Mar 2026now
Delegation for relations with the Korean PeninsulaDKOR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 202424 Mar 2026
Delegation for relations with South AfricaD-ZA DelegationSubstitute18 Mar 202525 Mar 2026

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurIMCO8 Jun 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionIMCO23 Apr 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus)Opinion rapporteurIMCO16 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionIMCO16 Mar 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationIMCO24 Feb 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Shadow rapporteurIMCO28 Jan 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Shadow rapporteurIMCO27 Jan 2026
Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsRapporteurIMCO10 Nov 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurIMCO24 Jun 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationIMCO14 Feb 2025

Show all 18 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

69 contributions recorded, 20 written statements; 17 on behalf of their group; 61 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 137

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
3 Sept 2026Further expansion of access to the EU market for Ukrainian agricultural products P-10-2026-003475Priority written questionNot yet answered
31 Aug 2026Mercosur and Brazil’s failure to meet EU food safety standards E-10-2026-003371Written questionNot yet answered
31 Aug 2026Credibility of the excessive deficit procedure in relation to France E-10-2026-003372Written questionNot yet answered
19 Aug 2026Funding foreign carbon credits rather than modernising Europe E-10-2026-003295Written questionNot yet answered
19 Aug 2026Burden of the EU ETS on the production of fertilisers for export E-10-2026-003296Written questionNot yet answered
12 Aug 2026The Commission is cutting back on the promotion of European food while opening up the market to imports from third countries E-10-2026-003264Written questionNot yet answered
10 Aug 2026Uneven playing field for EU farmers E-10-2026-003246Written question30 Sept 2026
10 Aug 2026Criteria for exemptions from extended producer responsibility under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive E-10-2026-003247Written questionNot yet answered
3 Aug 2026Extension of the EU ETS to international flights E-10-2026-003196Written questionNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—

Show all 137 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 52

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI18
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI4
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI7
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI9
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI13
17 Jul 2026Multiannual plan for the fisheries exploiting demersal stocks in the western Mediterranean Sea PECH-AM-791020 PECH14
16 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) IMCO-AM-790905 IMCO28
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791042 IMCO21
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791041 IMCO15
16 Jul 2026Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791040 IMCO17

Show all 52 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Piotr MÜLLER”. Member record. memberId 257080. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257080?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257080. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257080?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257080,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Piotr MÜLLER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257080?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257080?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257080. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257080. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}