Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 95 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 95 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a
Result
209 for · 282 against · 153 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a – Am 95
Vote id
191245
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 282 against, 153 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 53Against 2Abst. 66No vote 14 of 135Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
RenewFor 18Against 9Abst. 38No vote 12 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
EPPFor 7Against 156Abst. 0No vote 22 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 10Against 70Abst. 0No vote 1 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 13Against 17Abst. 44No vote 11 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.75 397 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment284 for, 288 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 588 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 29 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment258 for, 347 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.74 530 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAmendment248 for, 294 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 545 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment294 for, 334 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 599 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote287 for, 278 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 560 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAmendment337 for, 246 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 555 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonOther181 for, 259 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 41 %r · shared0.73 413 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 547 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 95 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191245, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191245 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191245,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 95 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191245}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191245},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191245, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}