Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 104 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Vote
Amendment 104 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i
Result
219 for · 276 against · 154 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i – Am 104
Vote id
191244
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 219 for, 276 against, 154 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 60Against 4Abst. 58No vote 13 of 135Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.24
RenewFor 21Against 6Abst. 39No vote 11 of 77Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
EPPFor 11Against 154Abst. 0No vote 20 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 7Against 73Abst. 0No vote 1 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 10Against 11Abst. 53No vote 11 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.57
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 2No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment308 for, 309 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.76 598 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 548 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment276 for, 305 against, 65 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment294 for, 334 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 605 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAmendment248 for, 294 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 545 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment284 for, 288 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 592 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 29 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment258 for, 347 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 600 voters
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Gaza Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – GazaOther184 for, 241 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.74 402 voters
22 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Separate vote266 for, 304 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.74 530 voters
12 Mar 2025Recital H — part 2 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaSplit vote344 for, 297 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 104 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 191244, reference 2025/0531(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191244 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-191244,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 104 to article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i — Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191244}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/191244},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 191244, reference 2025/0531(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}