Member
Daniel OBAJTEK
ECR · Poland
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
82.8 %
4 909 of 5 928 roll calls while in office
ECR median: 91.6 % (−8.8 pts)
Chamber median: 90.2 %
With majority line ⓘ
91.4 %
4 470 of 4 893 votes where their group had a line
ECR median: 91.1 % (+0.2 pts)
71 opposite (for ↔ against), 61 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Daniel OBAJTEK | 82.8 % |
| ECR median | 91.6 % |
| Lowest in the group | 47.1 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.7 % |
| Members | 79 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Daniel OBAJTEK | 91.4 % |
| ECR median | 91.1 % |
| Lowest in the group | 66.8 % |
| Highest in the group | 93.7 % |
| Members | 79 |
- Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R | 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N | 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N | 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L | 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital H | 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 | 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 | 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 | 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 | 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 | 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 | 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 | 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 | 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 | 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 | 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 | 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 | 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 | 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 | 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 | 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 | 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 | 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 | 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 | 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 | 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 | 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 | 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 | 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 | 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 | 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 | 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 | 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 | 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 | 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 | 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 | 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 | 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 | 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 | 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 | 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 | 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 | 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 | 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 | 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 | 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 | 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 | 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 | 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 | 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Seats
| Body | Role | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee | Substitute | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA Delegation | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS Delegation | Member | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
Dossiers
| Dossier | Role | Committee | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110 | Rapporteur | ITRE | 1 Jun 2026 |
| Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality | Opinion rapporteur | ITRE | 27 Aug 2025 |
| Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 8 Jul 2025 |
| Clean Industrial Deal | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 24 Apr 2025 |
| General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 - all sections | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 5 Sept 2024 |
| General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 - all sections - opinion in a form of letter | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 4 Sept 2024 |
| Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 3 Sept 2024 |
| Guidelines for the 2025 Budget – Section III (draft) – opinion in a form of letter | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 3 Sept 2024 |
| Komisja ITRE | Shadow rapporteur | ITRE | 30 Aug 2024 |
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Economy & single market 13
- Climate & environment 12
- Energy 7
- Justice, rule of law & rights 7
- Foreign affairs 6
- EU institutions & Parliament 5
- Transport & tourism 5
- Defence & security 4
- Trade & customs 4
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 3
- Migration & asylum 2
- Agriculture, food & fisheries 1
- EU budget & funds 1
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
13 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 22 minutes of speaking time.
| Date | Debate | Kind | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 May 2026 | Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 10 Mar 2026 | Presentation of the Energy Package (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Ending all energy imports from Russia to the EU and closing loopholes through third countries (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 11 Sept 2025 | Solidarity with Poland following the deliberate violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 18 Jun 2025 | Clean Industrial Deal (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 7 May 2025 | Resilience and the need to improve the interconnection of energy grid infrastructure in the EU: the first lessons from the blackout in the Iberian Peninsula (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 2 Apr 2025 | Energy-intensive industries (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 13 Mar 2025 | Action Plan for Affordable Energy (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 27 Nov 2024 | Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Tackling the steel crisis: boosting competitive and sustainable European steel and maintaining quality jobs (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 8 Oct 2024 | The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 18 Sept 2024 | The Hungarian “National Card” scheme and its consequences for Schengen and the area of freedom, security and justice (debate) | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 17 Sept 2024 | State of the Energy union (debate) on behalf of ECR | Speech · 3 min | Read |
Questions and motions, 29
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
Amendments tabled in committee, 20
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical
National delegation
- Delegation Poland National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 1 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Daniel OBAJTEK”. Member record. memberId 257058. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257058?page=76&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257058. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257058?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257058,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Daniel OBAJTEK}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257058?page=76&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257058?page=76&speeches=all&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-10-01},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 257058. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257058. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}