Skip to content

Decision

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Effect
Adopted
Result
310 for · 222 against · 68 abstained roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:05–12:25
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a small majority
Source
Committee report by Marko Vešligaj
Topics
Jobs, social affairs & equality Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
101 votes · 55 roll calls · 4 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call) · Members (27 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
181339
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a small majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 96 parts of the text voted on separately (64 adopted, 32 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D and Renew; opposed by EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 2Abst. 1No vote 22 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 2No vote 16 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 54Against 59Abst. 48No vote 27 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.05
ECRFor 0Against 66Abst. 3No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 4Abst. 14No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 8

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria95420.25
Belgium153310.57
Bulgaria92330.46
Cyprus3102—
Czechia312240.56
Germany36405150.24
Denmark84210.36
Estonia4102—
Spain25101960.19
Finland121020.88
France34292160.28
Greece133230.58
Croatia55200.13
Hungary210090.75
Ireland110031.00
Italy31282150.26
Lithuania54110.25
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia5400—
Malta0312—
Netherlands167430.39
Poland2024360.27
Portugal143040.74
Romania4113150.42
Sweden124410.40
Slovenia4500—
Slovakia53610.14

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 600 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches113 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Lara MAGONI ItalyECRSpeeches312 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE NetherlandsRenewSpeeches212 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roxana MÎNZATU RomaniaS&DSpeeches212 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Not in office
Marko VEŠLIGAJ CroatiaS&DSpeeches212 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches212 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Show the other 28 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Alicia HOMS GINEL SpainS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alessandra MORETTI ItalyS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Heléne FRITZON SwedenS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Tomislav SOKOL CroatiaEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mathilde ANDROUËT FrancePatriotsSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Elena KOUNTOURA GreeceThe LeftSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marc ANGEL LuxembourgS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA SpainS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Gabriella GERZSENYI HungaryEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Laurence TROCHU FranceECRSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Eleonora MELETI GreeceEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Irmhild BOSSDORF GermanyESNSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Elena SANCHO MURILLO SpainS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lucia YAR SlovakiaRenewSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriotsSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL PortugalEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS PolandS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Gabriela FIREA RomaniaS&DSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo groupSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Benedetta SCUDERI ItalyGreensSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Carolina MORACE ItalyThe LeftSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nina CARBERRY IrelandEPPSpeeches112 Nov 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 101

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call172 for, 440 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
2Amendment 4 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 4 Roll call159 for, 424 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 1 – Am 2 Roll call207 for, 391 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
Show the other 100 votesShow the other 98 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 4 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 4 Roll call159 for, 424 against, 31 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 1 – Am 2 Roll call207 for, 391 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 3 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 3/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the denial of abortion care,’”Roll call510 for, 41 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
5Paragraph 3 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 3/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call381 for, 182 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
6Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – After § 3 – Am 3 Roll call208 for, 390 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots
7Separate vote on paragraph 5 Counted380 for, 116 against, 96 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
8Paragraph 10 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘, including due to law enforcement practices’ and ‘mandatory,’”Roll call437 for, 166 against, 6 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
9Paragraph 10 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/2 Part voted on: “, including due to law enforcement practices”Roll call295 for, 302 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
10Paragraph 10 — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/3 Part voted on: “mandatory,”Roll call298 for, 282 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
11Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘decriminalisation of people and especially women in prostitution,’ and ‘demand reduction, punishment of clients,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
12Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “decriminalisation of people and especially women in prostitution,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
13Paragraph 13 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “demand reduction, punishment of clients,”Counted253 for, 182 against, 156 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
14Separate vote on paragraph 14 Counted352 for, 162 against, 89 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
15Paragraph 16 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 16/1 Roll call439 for, 138 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D
16Paragraph 16 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 16/2 Roll call299 for, 270 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D
17Paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 21/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and calls on the Commission to increase investment in gender mainstreaming in health systems’”Roll call518 for, 24 against, 74 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
18Paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 21/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call301 for, 298 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
19Separate vote on paragraph 27 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 27 Roll call341 for, 218 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
20Separate vote on paragraph 28 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 28 Roll call336 for, 218 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
21Separate vote on paragraph 29 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 29 Roll call292 for, 262 against, 56 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
22Separate vote on paragraph 30 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 30 Roll call359 for, 200 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
23Paragraph 36 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘to be monitored within the framework of the European Semester’ and ‘calls for structural reforms, with gender-responsive public investment and economic redistribution to address systemic gender inequalities;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
24Paragraph 36 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “to be monitored within the framework of the European Semester”Counted278 for, 328 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
25Paragraph 36 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “calls for structural reforms, with gender-responsive public investment and economic redistribution to address systemic gender inequalities;”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
26Paragraph 37 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to propose legislation on teleworking rules and the Right to Disconnect without further delay and to ensure it is done in a gender-responsive manner which does not exacerbate existing gender inequalities;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
27Paragraph 37 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted303 for, 279 against, 31 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
28Paragraph 46 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘ensuring collective bargaining rights,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
29Paragraph 46 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted372 for, 157 against, 83 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
30Paragraph 47 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘horizontal and vertical segregation of the labour market as one of the main reasons for a’”Counted433 for, 161 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
31Paragraph 47 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted289 for, 310 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
32Paragraph 48 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘free and’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
33Paragraph 48 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted289 for, 321 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
34Separate vote on paragraph 57 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 57 Roll call300 for, 238 against, 78 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
35Separate vote on paragraph 59 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 59 Roll call256 for, 305 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
36Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘binding’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
37Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “that word”Counted251 for, 332 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
38Separate vote on paragraph 64 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 64 Roll call262 for, 287 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
39Separate vote on paragraph 65 Counted263 for, 299 against, 41 abstained RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
40Separate vote on paragraph 67 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 67 Roll call251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
41Separate vote on Title before paragraph 68 Counted261 for, 326 against, 14 abstained Rejected
42Separate vote on paragraph 68 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 68 Roll call262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
43Paragraph 69 — part 1 of 4 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘all’, ‘and sufficient in-house capacity to systemically integrate a holistic gender perspective and conduct gender analysis’ and ‘all phases of’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
44Paragraph 69 — part 2 of 4 Part voted on: “all”Counted237 for, 330 against, 41 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
45Paragraph 69 — part 3 of 4 Part voted on: “and sufficient in-house capacity to systemically integrate a holistic gender perspective and conduct gender analysis”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
46Paragraph 69 — part 4 of 4 Part voted on: “all phases of”Counted249 for, 319 against, 41 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
47Paragraph 71 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist,’ and second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’”Roll call411 for, 161 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
48Paragraph 71 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/2 Part voted on: “feminist,”Roll call292 for, 260 against, 47 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
49Paragraph 71 — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 71/3 Part voted on: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’”Roll call368 for, 147 against, 93 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
50Paragraph 72 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ and ‘and to ensure that the next MFF contains strengthened gender equality targets in external actions with 85 % of all EU official development assistance (ODA) mainstreaming gender (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) marker G1) and 20 % of ODA dedicated to gender-targeted projects (OECD marker 2);’”Roll call396 for, 183 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
51Paragraph 72 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/2 Part voted on: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’”Roll call365 for, 149 against, 73 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
52Paragraph 72 — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/3 Part voted on: “and to ensure that the next MFF contains strengthened gender equality targets in external actions with 85 % of all EU official development assistance (ODA) mainstreaming gender (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) marker G1) and 20 % of ODA dedicated to gender-targeted projects (OECD marker 2);”Roll call254 for, 324 against, 30 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
53Separate vote on paragraph 73 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 73 Roll call279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
54Paragraph 74 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 74/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to allocate targeted funding to Permanent Representations to enable them to effectively carry out this task’”Roll call397 for, 170 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
55Paragraph 74 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 74/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call258 for, 325 against, 21 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
56Separate vote on paragraph 77 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 77 Roll call346 for, 224 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; separate: Members
57Paragraph 78 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 78/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminism and’”Roll call396 for, 182 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
58Paragraph 78 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 78/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call289 for, 304 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
59Paragraph 79 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist,’ and ‘and sexual and reproductive rights’”Roll call406 for, 176 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
60Paragraph 79 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/2 Part voted on: “feminist,”Roll call299 for, 246 against, 45 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
61Paragraph 79 — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 79/3 Part voted on: “and sexual and reproductive rights”Roll call359 for, 167 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
62Separate vote on paragraph 80 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
63Separate vote on paragraph 83 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 83 Roll call272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
64Separate vote on paragraph 84 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 84 Roll call269 for, 313 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
65Separate vote on paragraph 85 Show of hands RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
66Separate vote on paragraph 86 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 86 Roll call273 for, 324 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
67Paragraph 87 — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 87/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’”Roll call411 for, 187 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
68Paragraph 87 — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 87/2 Part voted on: “that word”Roll call362 for, 163 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew; split: Members
69Paragraph 89 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘or migration status’ and ‘gender identity’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
70Paragraph 89 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “or migration status”Counted272 for, 323 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
71Paragraph 89 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “gender identity”Counted325 for, 235 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
72Separate vote on paragraph 90 Counted275 for, 313 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
73Separate vote on paragraph 93 Counted281 for, 301 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
74Paragraph 100 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘femicide,’ and ‘, gender identity’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
75Paragraph 100 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “femicide,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
76Paragraph 100 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “, gender identity”Counted343 for, 213 against, 39 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
77Separate vote on citation 64 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
78Separate vote on citation 74 Counted287 for, 258 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
79Recital D — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights (SRHR)’ and ‘feminism and’”Roll call404 for, 176 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
80Recital D — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/2 Part voted on: “and rights (SRHR)”Roll call347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
81Recital D — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital D/3 Part voted on: “feminism and”Roll call289 for, 289 against, 7 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
82Recital G — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital G/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘, and a lack of safe and legal migration opportunities’”Roll call493 for, 8 against, 101 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
83Recital G — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital G/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: Members
84Separate vote on recital H A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital H Roll call298 for, 239 against, 61 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
85Separate vote on recital I A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital I Roll call355 for, 191 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; separate: Members
86Recital L — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘as well as gendered disinformation,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
87Recital L — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted302 for, 282 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
88Recital M — part 1 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ and ‘gender identity, gender expression,’”Roll call476 for, 41 against, 92 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
89Recital M — part 2 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/2 Part voted on: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’”Roll call379 for, 134 against, 80 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
90Recital M — part 3 A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital M/3 Part voted on: “gender identity, gender expression,”Roll call331 for, 220 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew, S&D; split: Members
91Recital Q — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas labour market segregation, as well as horizontal and vertical gender segregation in education, remains a key factor contributing to gender inequality in the work domain, while gender stereotyping is a major driver of occupational segregation that women face continuously while also receiving lower wages;”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
92Recital Q — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas labour market disparities, differences in employment for women and men across sectors and regions, including in outermost regions, and a lack of fair working conditions and safety for women workers are still persistent across the EU, and the existing gender pay gap is, to a large extent, the consequence of the systematic undervaluation of work carried out in female-dominated sectors in which there is a prevalence of women and only around 20 % of men participate, such as care, education, health and welfare; whereas the issue of “equal pay for equal work or work of equal value” therefore needs to be tackled to close the gender pay gap; whereas education, especially tertiary education, training and social protection, is essential for gender equality, especially for women over the age of 55 and women living in rural, remote or depopulated areas who face specific and compounded obstacles; whereas education is also essential to allow everyone to adapt to labour market changes and have access to quality job opportunities;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
93Separate vote on recital S Show of hands RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
94Recital X — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘many of whom face exploitation due to a lack of adequate regularisation pathways,’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
95Recital X — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted270 for, 299 against, 39 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: Members
96Separate vote on recital Y Counted258 for, 268 against, 84 abstained RejectedRequested byseparate: Members
97Separate vote on recital Z A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital Z Roll call293 for, 269 against, 42 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
98Separate vote on recital AC A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital AC Roll call276 for, 317 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D; separate: Members
99Recital AD — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas women and LGBTIQ+ individuals, whether in transit or residing in reception facilities, are frequently exposed to specific gender-based risks, including violence, insufficient access to healthcare and legal insecurity;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
100Recital AD — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Counted287 for, 285 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Members
101Final vote — text as a whole A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew, Patriots, ESN · split votes by Members (27) · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0210

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution setting out its position on the EU's Gender Equality Strategy for 2025 and beyond.

The text calls for action on gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health rights, and equal pay, among other areas.

As a non-binding resolution, it expresses Parliament's stance but does not create law.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution calls on the Commission to present an ambitious Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030 with concrete measures. It demands action on gender-based violence, healthcare, work, poverty, education, care, representation, climate, foreign policy, and civil society.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2125(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 13 November 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 13 October 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 24 October 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 13 November 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: FEMM · Author: Marko VEŠLIGAJ (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy · Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Gender Equality Strategy

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Decision, 13 November 2025. votingId 181339, document A-10-2025-0210, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-13/22 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-11-13-22,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-13/22}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-11-13/22},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 181339, document A-10-2025-0210, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}