Skip to content

Member · Former member

Péter MAGYAR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
17.0 %ⓘ of 4 836 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
79.4 %ⓘ of 820 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
140 of 786 votesⓘ
Member id
256868
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

17.0 %

820 of 4 836 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−73.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

79.4 %

651 of 820 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (−14.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

17.8 %

140 of 786 votes where their group had a clear line

61 opposite (for ↔ against), 79 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

10.6 %

87 of 820 votes cast

Participation 17.0 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Péter MAGYAR17.0 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 79.4 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Péter MAGYAR79.4 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 549 for, 21 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 6 255 for, 316 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 565 for, 8 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 177 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 8 200 for, 400 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 182 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Paragraph 8 — part 2 444 for, 153 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Separate vote on paragraph 7 458 for, 90 against, 63 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
18 Sept 2024Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 522 for, 127 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Sept 2024Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 516 for, 129 against, 27 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group 437 for, 13 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Sept 2024Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 102 for, 279 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
18 Jul 2024Request by The Left Group – Motion for adjournment of the vote on the election of the President of the Commission Request by The Left Group — Motion for adjournment of the vote 101 for, 531 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 495 for, 137 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Separate vote on recital E 482 for, 165 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 96 for, 537 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 113 for, 497 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 57 for, 427 against, 177 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 8 63 for, 564 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 7 414 for, 193 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 6 418 for, 168 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 5 468 for, 119 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 4 393 for, 178 against, 75 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 3 457 for, 133 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 2 450 for, 165 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 1 483 for, 153 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 35 for, 583 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 3 498 for, 111 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 2 518 for, 47 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 1 456 for, 166 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 180 for, 436 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 194 for, 400 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 3 — part 1 476 for, 107 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 91 for, 468 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 119 for, 337 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group 149 for, 251 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 36 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 69 of 91 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary95 % of 788 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary95 % of 777 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary94 % of 783 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary93 % of 682 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary93 % of 768 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg83 % of 362 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 704 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 536 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland82 % of 533 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 557 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia74 % of 802 shared82 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance74 % of 779 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia73 % of 533 shared82 %
Sigrid FRIIS RenewDenmark73 % of 341 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium73 % of 785 shared82 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania73 % of 733 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania73 % of 669 shared82 %
Anna STÜRGKH RenewAustria73 % of 794 shared82 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania73 % of 816 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

15 contributions recorded; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Jul 2025Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 May 2025High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
6 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence (RC-B10-0146/2025, B10-0144/2025, B10-0145/2025, B10-0146/2025, B10-0147/2025, B10-0148/2025, B10-0149/2025, B10-0150/2025, B10-0151/2025) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2025Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 15 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Péter MAGYAR”. Member record. memberId 256868. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=97&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256868?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256868,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Péter MAGYAR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=97&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=97&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256868. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}