Skip to content

Member · Former member

Péter MAGYAR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
18.4 %ⓘ of 490 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
67.8 %ⓘ of 90 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
20 of 81 votesⓘ
Member id
256868
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

18.4 %

90 of 490 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−72.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

67.8 %

61 of 90 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−27.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

24.7 %

20 of 81 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 15 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

17.8 %

16 of 90 votes cast

Participation 18.4 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Péter MAGYAR18.4 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 67.8 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Péter MAGYAR67.8 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 146 to recital 15 263 for, 299 against, 71 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 121, adding text after recital 3 172 for, 315 against, 133 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 113 to Article 1 355 for, 247 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 147 to Article 1 527 for, 76 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 145 to Article 1 141 for, 498 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 141 to Article 1 177 for, 460 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 139 to Article 1 136 for, 489 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 138 to Article 1 160 for, 461 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 487 for, 134 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 137 to Article 1 158 for, 465 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 125 to Article 1 167 for, 446 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 144 to Article 1 114 for, 495 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 124 to Article 1 208 for, 382 against, 53 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 135 to Article 1 213 for, 422 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 133 to Article 1 144 for, 476 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 132 to Article 1 170 for, 465 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 488 for, 143 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 131 to Article 1 189 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 143 to Article 1 282 for, 360 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 148 to Article 1 305 for, 325 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 123 to Article 1 516 for, 81 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Final votePassed 492 for, 111 against, 39 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendments 81 + 86 (voted as one) to Annex I 192 for, 411 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 85 to Annex I 146 for, 484 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 84 to Annex I 136 for, 493 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 87 to Article 1 189 for, 401 against, 48 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 23 to Article 1 — part 4 381 for, 249 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 74 358 for, 264 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 73 367 for, 257 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 24 387 for, 227 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 21 390 for, 217 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Final votePassed 458 for, 182 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) 183 for, 445 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
7 Oct 2025Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 552 for, 52 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Inland waterway transport: River Information Systems (RIS) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 636 for, 10 against, 4 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Revision of the Visa Suspension Mechanism Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 518 for, 96 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by The Left Group 175 for, 239 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group 196 for, 234 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 355 for, 173 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 83 for, 354 against, 110 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 86 for, 371 against, 120 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 89 for, 360 against, 120 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 95 for, 353 against, 130 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 26, adding text after recital H 179 for, 394 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 2 494 for, 71 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 1 582 for, 5 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 25 to paragraph 30 188 for, 397 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 26 82 for, 471 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 26 87 for, 466 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 49 of 68 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary95 % of 788 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary95 % of 777 shared89 %
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary94 % of 783 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary93 % of 682 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary93 % of 768 shared89 %
Zoltán TARR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg83 % of 362 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 704 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 536 shared89 %
Krzysztof BREJZA EPPPoland82 % of 533 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 557 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia74 % of 802 shared82 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance74 % of 779 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia73 % of 533 shared82 %
Sigrid FRIIS RenewDenmark73 % of 341 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium73 % of 785 shared82 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania73 % of 733 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania73 % of 669 shared82 %
Anna STÜRGKH RenewAustria73 % of 794 shared82 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania73 % of 816 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

15 contributions recorded; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Jul 2025Post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2025EU Preparedness Union in light of the upcoming wildfire and droughts season (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025EU framework conditions for competitive, efficient and sustainable public transport services at all levels (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2025Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast) (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 May 2025High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
6 May 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence (RC-B10-0146/2025, B10-0144/2025, B10-0145/2025, B10-0146/2025, B10-0147/2025, B10-0148/2025, B10-0149/2025, B10-0150/2025, B10-0151/2025) (vote) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2025Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 15 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Péter MAGYAR”. Member record. memberId 256868. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256868?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256868,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Péter MAGYAR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256868?page=51&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256868. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256868. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}