Member

Dóra DÁVID

EPP · Hungary

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Hungary
Roll-call participation: 75.2 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 84.1 %ⓘ of 466 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 44 of 436 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI (substitute), IMCO, PETI (substitute)
Member id: 256862

National party: TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 44 of 436 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI (substitute), IMCO, PETI (substitute)
Member id: 256862

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

75.2 %

466 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−15.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.1 %

392 of 466 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−11.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

10.1 %

44 of 436 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 29 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

8.4 %

39 of 466 votes cast

Participation 75.2 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Dóra DÁVID	75.2 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 84.1 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Dóra DÁVID	84.1 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point v — part 1	417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 7	381 for, 118 against, 36 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 6	357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5	343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4	351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3	391 for, 116 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2	338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1	423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 2	182 for, 369 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 1	392 for, 153 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point s	128 for, 376 against, 55 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2	343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1	386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2	275 for, 252 against, 35 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1	373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p	470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point o	179 for, 368 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 2	280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 1	415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 2	240 for, 316 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 1	420 for, 88 against, 56 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point j	533 for, 28 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 2	286 for, 237 against, 45 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 1	386 for, 120 against, 61 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 2	255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 1	464 for, 33 against, 76 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point f	200 for, 230 against, 129 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point b	201 for, 248 against, 114 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, point a	104 for, 398 against, 59 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital O	257 for, 297 against, 25 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital N	270 for, 287 against, 23 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 2	258 for, 290 against, 28 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 1	447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14	239 for, 299 against, 41 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11	210 for, 349 against, 20 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 2	254 for, 315 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 1	491 for, 43 against, 45 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 2	246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 1	470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 2	250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 1	467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3	211 for, 358 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3	253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG	265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2	269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1	397 for, 133 against, 49 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2	220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1	426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	5
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	7
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	0
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	4
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	0
12 Mar 2025	7	3
13 Mar 2025	3	2
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	3
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	3
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	4
17 Jun 2025	8	7
18 Jun 2025	7	0
19 Jun 2025	6	5
8 Jul 2025	8	7
9 Jul 2025	14	12
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	5
10 Sept 2025	15	13
11 Sept 2025	8	6
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	8
9 Oct 2025	10	8
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	3
23 Oct 2025	5	0
13 Nov 2025	16	14
25 Nov 2025	13	8
26 Nov 2025	10	9
27 Nov 2025	11	9
16 Dec 2025	11	10
17 Dec 2025	11	0
18 Dec 2025	6	5
20 Jan 2026	6	4
21 Jan 2026	8	4
22 Jan 2026	8	0
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	9
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	9	4
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	1
28 Apr 2026	14	11
29 Apr 2026	17	14
30 Apr 2026	11	9
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	8
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	6
7 Jul 2026	15	13
8 Jul 2026	15	14
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	11
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Gabriella GERZSENYI	Gabriella GERZSENYI	EPP	Hungary	99 % of 2 701 shared	89 %
Select Eszter LAKOS	Eszter LAKOS	EPP	Hungary	99 % of 3 611 shared	89 %
Select András Tivadar KULJA	András Tivadar KULJA	EPP	Hungary	99 % of 3 586 shared	89 %
Select Kinga KOLLÁR	Kinga KOLLÁR	EPP	Hungary	99 % of 3 389 shared	89 %
Select Zoltán TARR	Zoltán TARR Former member	EPP	Hungary	98 % of 1 842 shared	89 %
Select Péter MAGYAR	Péter MAGYAR Former member	EPP	Hungary	95 % of 788 shared	89 %
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	EPP	Germany	89 % of 1 469 shared	89 %
Select Willemien KONING	Willemien KONING	EPP	Netherlands	89 % of 1 429 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	88 % of 3 162 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	88 % of 3 269 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	Renew	France	78 % of 1 997 shared	82 %
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	78 % of 3 458 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	78 % of 2 702 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	78 % of 3 843 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	78 % of 2 971 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	78 % of 2 699 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	77 % of 3 090 shared	82 %
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	Renew	France	77 % of 3 976 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	77 % of 3 461 shared	82 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	77 % of 3 767 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	12 Jun 2026	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Member	15 Jun 2026	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working group	Member	12 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on Traditional Minorities, National Communities and LanguagesIG10-25 Intergroup / working group	Member	29 Jan 2025	now

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	IMCO	21 May 2025
INI on the protection of minors online	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	29 Jan 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

22 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 28 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Jun 2026	Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop destroying videogames’ (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Tackling AI deepfakes and sexual exploitation on social media by making full use of the EU’s digital rules (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Dec 2025	Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime (A10-0240/2025 - Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier) (vote)	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	2030 Consumer Agenda (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Digital Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Protection of minors online (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Protection of minors online (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Protection of minors online (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 22 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 7

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
24 Feb 2026	Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026	Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603	Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors	30 Apr 2026
22 Dec 2025	Serious concerns regarding compliance with European values and EU law in Slovakia E-10-2025-005054	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	21 Apr 2026
20 Dec 2025	Implementation of EU anti-poverty strategy based on accurate data E-10-2025-005037	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	25 Feb 2026
25 Nov 2025	Level playing field in e-commerce: perspective from central and eastern Europe E-10-2025-004683	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	20 Feb 2026
17 Nov 2025	Meta’s revenue from scam advertising and possible unfair commercial practices E-10-2025-004574	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	25 Mar 2026
12 Nov 2025	Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488	Written questionwith 47 co-authors	5 Jan 2026

Show all 7 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	3
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	1
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	8
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	4
9 Mar 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities IMCO-AM-785341	IMCO	4
9 Mar 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities IMCO-AM-785342	IMCO	2
14 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CJ40-AM-784274	CJ40	3
10 Jul 2025	Protection of minors online IMCO-AM-775649	IMCO	27
10 Jul 2025	Protection of minors online IMCO-AM-774602	IMCO	45
11 Apr 2025	Public procurement IMCO-AM-772147	IMCO	6

Show all 15 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Dóra DÁVID”. Member record. memberId 256862. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256862. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256862?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256862,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Dóra DÁVID}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256862?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256862. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256862. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 7

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928