Skip to content

Member

Petras GRAŽULIS

ESN · Lithuania

Group
ESN
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
84.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
64.4 %ⓘ of 525 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.9 %
More facts (5)
National party
TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
175 of 503 votesⓘ
Committees
ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id
256808
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

84.8 %

526 of 620 final votes while in office

ESN median: 90.8 % (−6.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

64.4 %

338 of 525 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.9 % (−29.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

34.8 %

175 of 503 votes where their group had a clear line

51 opposite (for ↔ against), 100 abstained against the line, 24 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

28.7 %

151 of 526 votes cast

Participation 84.8 % — ESN median 90.8 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Petras GRAŽULIS84.8 %
ESN median90.8 %
Lowest in the group65.8 %
Highest in the group97.7 %
Members27
With majority line 64.4 % — ESN median 93.9 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Petras GRAŽULIS64.4 %
ESN median93.9 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members27
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
23 Oct 2025Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products Proposal to reject the text 93 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 458 for, 18 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Recital Q — part 2 476 for, 42 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 183 for, 402 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections Paragraph 9 — part 2 450 for, 153 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 457 for, 103 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 18 111 for, 213 against, 311 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 548 for, 14 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2 312 for, 281 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 310 for, 277 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on recital D 464 for, 136 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 24 257 for, 358 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 23 263 for, 349 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on paragraph 12 334 for, 286 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Separate vote on paragraph 10 381 for, 236 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 6 462 for, 162 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 5 344 for, 227 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 4 326 for, 272 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 3 321 for, 270 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 2 411 for, 169 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Paragraph 4 — part 1 485 for, 152 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Final vote — text as a wholeDischarge decision adopted 476 for, 99 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 1 to recital A 180 for, 449 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 15 182 for, 437 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 191 for, 441 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: Agencies Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 198 for, 429 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Final vote — text as a wholeDischarge decision adopted 441 for, 125 against, 73 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Paragraph 17 — part 2 445 for, 178 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 2 334 for, 285 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 1 459 for, 161 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 1 to paragraph 16 461 for, 173 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Final vote — text as a wholeResolution adopted 384 for, 202 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 15 181 for, 451 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 155, adding text after paragraph 86 119 for, 471 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 160, adding text after paragraph 84 188 for, 451 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 168, adding text after paragraph 82 71 for, 542 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 159, adding text after paragraph 82 84 for, 483 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 169, adding text after paragraph 82 72 for, 527 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 82 282 for, 317 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 158, adding text after paragraph 81 141 for, 445 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 157, adding text after paragraph 79 182 for, 412 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 173, adding text after paragraph 79 284 for, 314 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 172, adding text after paragraph 79 254 for, 331 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 178 to paragraph 79, after point l 249 for, 275 against, 127 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 177 to paragraph 79, after point l 285 for, 306 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 151 to paragraph 79, after point l 169 for, 443 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 26 to paragraph 79, after point j 321 for, 240 against, 84 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 150 to paragraph 79, after point g 161 for, 448 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 147 to paragraph 78 171 for, 462 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Oct 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections Amendment 154, adding text after paragraph 77 131 for, 456 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly75 % of 1 771 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany74 % of 4 318 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany72 % of 4 495 shared80 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany72 % of 3 499 shared80 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany71 % of 4 270 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany71 % of 4 685 shared80 %
Stanislav STOYANOV ESNBulgaria71 % of 4 553 shared80 %
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany71 % of 4 589 shared80 %
Petar VOLGIN ESNBulgaria70 % of 4 471 shared80 %
Rada LAYKOVA ESNBulgaria70 % of 4 167 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany92 % of 203 shared49 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland70 % of 1 096 shared70 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance66 % of 4 197 shared64 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance66 % of 4 319 shared64 %
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR PatriotsHungary66 % of 4 437 shared70 %
György HÖLVÉNYI PatriotsHungary65 % of 3 117 shared70 %
András LÁSZLÓ PatriotsHungary65 % of 4 121 shared70 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia65 % of 2 877 shared70 %
Viktória FERENC PatriotsHungary65 % of 4 163 shared70 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland65 % of 4 436 shared69 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember22 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedVice-President6 Feb 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

131 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 128 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
26 Feb 2026Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania B-10-2026-0076Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—
8 Dec 2025Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Dec 2025Inquiry on politicians on university boards E-10-2025-004762Written questionwith 20 co-authors23 Mar 2026
26 Nov 2025Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707Written questionwith 20 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 15 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petras GRAŽULIS”. Member record. memberId 256808. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256808?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256808,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petras GRAŽULIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=67&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256808. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}