Member
Martine KEMP
EPP · Luxembourg
- Group
- EPP PPE
- Country
- Luxembourg
- Roll-call participation
- 88.5 %ⓘ of 5 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
- With majority line
- 96.0 %ⓘ of 4 871 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
88.5 %
4 871 of 5 503 roll calls while in office
EPP median: 89.9 % (−1.4 pts)
Chamber median: 90.2 %
With majority line ⓘ
96.0 %
4 674 of 4 871 votes where their group had a line
EPP median: 93.6 % (+2.3 pts)
63 opposite (for ↔ against), 44 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Martine KEMP | 88.5 % |
| EPP median | 89.9 % |
| Lowest in the group | 17.0 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.6 % |
| Members | 196 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Martine KEMP | 96.0 % |
| EPP median | 93.6 % |
| Lowest in the group | 70.2 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.5 % |
| Members | 196 |
- Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R | 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N | 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N | 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L | 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital H | 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 | 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 | 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 | 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 | 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 | 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 | 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 | 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 | 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 | 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 | 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 | 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 | 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 | 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 | 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 | 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 | 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 | 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 | 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 | 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 | 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 | 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 | 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 | 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 | 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 | 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 | 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 | 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 | 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 | 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 | 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 | 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 | 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 | 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 | 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 | 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 | 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 | 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 | 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 | 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 | 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 | 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 | 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 | 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 | 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Seats
| Body | Role | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee | Substitute | 6 Dec 2024 | now |
| Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee | Member | 16 Dec 2024 | now |
| Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee | Substitute | 20 Jan 2025 | now |
| Committee on International TradeINTA Committee | Member | 16 Dec 2024 | now |
| Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee | Member | 16 Dec 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND Delegation | Substitute | 20 Jan 2025 | now |
| Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly | Member | 16 Dec 2024 | now |
| Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee | Substitute | 6 Dec 2024 | 19 Jan 2025 |
| Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND Delegation | Member | 16 Dec 2024 | 19 Jan 2025 |
Dossiers
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Economy & single market 11
- Digital, AI & data 6
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 6
- Trade & customs 6
- Justice, rule of law & rights 3
- Foreign affairs 2
- Health 2
- Agriculture, food & fisheries 1
- EU budget & funds 1
- Climate & environment 1
- Transport & tourism 1
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
5 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 8 minutes of speaking time.
| Date | Debate | Kind | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 May 2026 | Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 18 May 2026 | Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate) on behalf of EPP | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate) on behalf of EPP | Speech · 2 min | Read |
| 9 Oct 2025 | Declaration of principles for a gender-equal society (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Silent crisis: the mental health of Europe’s youth (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
Questions and motions, 6
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
| Date | Title | Kind | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Jul 2026 | Support for the development of sexual assault centres in the EU E-10-2026-002872 | Written questionwith 20 co-authors | Not yet answered |
| 10 Mar 2026 | German Bundeskartellamt inquiry into Amazon pricing practices E-10-2026-000989 | Written questionwith 24 co-authors | 5 May 2026 |
| 8 Dec 2025 | Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046 | Oral questionwith 42 co-authors | Not yet answered |
| 12 Nov 2025 | Child-like sex dolls for sale: major e-commerce platforms failing to comply with EU law E-10-2025-004488 | Written questionwith 47 co-authors | 5 Jan 2026 |
| 6 Oct 2025 | Online retail and unfair advantages E-10-2025-003905 | Written questionwith 16 co-authors | 1 Dec 2025 |
| 21 Feb 2025 | Commission’s response to the incomplete implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Member States E-10-2025-000810 | Written questionwith 50 co-authors | 27 May 2025 |
Amendments tabled in committee, 43
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
National delegation
- Delegation Luxembourg National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 30 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Martine KEMP”. Member record. memberId 249603. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/249603?page=76&roles=all&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/249603. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/249603?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-249603,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Martine KEMP}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/249603?page=76&roles=all&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/249603?page=76&roles=all&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-09-30},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 249603. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/249603. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}