Skip to content

Member

Riho TERRAS

EPP · Estonia

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Estonia
Roll-call participation
84.3 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
96.0 %ⓘ of 4 999 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PP Isamaa
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
143 of 4 829 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, SEDE (vice-chair)
Member id
204449
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

84.3 %

4 999 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.0 %

4 800 of 4 999 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+2.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.0 %

143 of 4 829 votes where their group had a clear line

123 opposite (for ↔ against), 16 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.7 %

34 of 4 999 votes cast

Participation 84.3 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Riho TERRAS84.3 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 96.0 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Riho TERRAS96.0 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 263 for, 108 against, 222 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 192 for, 374 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 Separate vote on paragraph 2 266 for, 304 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Final votePassed 436 for, 149 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Euratom Research and Training Programme for the period 2026-2027 complementing Horizon Europe Final votePassed 489 for, 55 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 6 to Article 1, point 2 Règlement (UE) nº 575/2013 Article 510, paragraph paragraph 7 et 8 259 for, 288 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio Amendment 1 115 for, 442 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Final votePassed 374 for, 176 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 177 for, 400 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 181 for, 396 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production Amendment 3 180 for, 367 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Final votePassed 411 for, 100 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 3, adding text after recital 11 164 for, 358 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 4, adding text after recital 10 217 for, 348 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 176 for, 380 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 5, adding text after recital 5 185 for, 362 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus Amendment 6 to Article 2, après le paragraph 2 172 for, 376 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Final votePassed 564 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 9, adding text after recital 29 171 for, 414 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 172 for, 405 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 14, adding text after recital 27 111 for, 428 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 13, adding text after recital 27 114 for, 424 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 30, adding text after recital 1 195 for, 387 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 29, adding text after recital 1 189 for, 388 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 19, adding text after recital 1 164 for, 407 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 171 for, 407 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 17, adding text after recital 1 169 for, 415 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 27 to Annex II, point 1 Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex VII, point 1 176 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 12 to Annex I, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Annex IV, point 4.1, fourth sentence 163 for, 418 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 31 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 187 for, 387 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 26 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 25, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 36, paragraph 2, point b 151 for, 421 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 25 to Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 158 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 15 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 23 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 30, paragraph 2 103 for, 438 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendments 7 + 11 (voted as one) to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 21, sous-point a Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 26, après le paragraph 1 105 for, 462 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 May 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism Amendment 10 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, paragraph 2, point b 159 for, 411 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Request by The Left Group 102 for, 378 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Request by the PfE Group 132 for, 334 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 306 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 172 for, 288 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 146 for, 311 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 164 for, 276 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 2 375 for, 92 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Paragraph 30 — part 1 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 100 for, 306 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 281 for, 193 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 14 to paragraph 16 67 for, 378 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 137 for, 326 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 May 2025Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 127 for, 321 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 30 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249290
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241817
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241312
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244536
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254541
10 Feb 202510
11 Feb 20253231
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 2025300
10 Mar 202520
11 Mar 202590
12 Mar 20252280
13 Mar 2025240
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251245
3 Apr 20256261
5 May 202550
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220215
8 May 2025103103
21 May 202522
22 May 20255352
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134120
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256965
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186182
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267250
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510098
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254321
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112109
22 Jan 20265857
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263837
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141129
24 Feb 2026430
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197193
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202632
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225214
29 Apr 2026296282
30 Apr 20266867
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 2026960
21 May 2026980
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127126
18 Jun 2026770
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 2026720
8 Jul 2026144142
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155155
16 Sept 20268026
17 Sept 2026124122

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jüri RATAS EPPEstonia97 % of 4 989 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany96 % of 3 919 shared89 %
Daniel CASPARY Former memberEPPGermany96 % of 2 995 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany96 % of 3 299 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany96 % of 4 085 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany96 % of 4 402 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 4 833 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany96 % of 4 917 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania96 % of 4 076 shared89 %
Stefan KÖHLER EPPGermany95 % of 4 511 shared89 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia87 % of 4 609 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania86 % of 4 368 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands86 % of 3 570 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany86 % of 3 524 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 3 867 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 4 825 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 3 769 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 330 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany86 % of 4 827 shared82 %
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN RenewGermany86 % of 3 961 shared82 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeVice-chair27 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute30 Sept 2025now
Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblySubstitute30 Sept 2025now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair31 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working groupMember12 Mar 2025now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 202526 Jan 2025
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE21 May 2026
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairSEDE18 May 2026
Delegation mission to Yerevan. Armenia.Official delegationDEPA22 Oct 2025
Flagship European defence projects of common interestShadow rapporteurSEDE4 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET14 Jul 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewOpinion rapporteurSEDE15 May 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairSEDE23 Jan 2025
AFET standing rapporteur for KosovoRapporteurAFET14 Nov 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairSEDE22 Jul 2024

Show all 9 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

30 contributions recorded, 2 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 39 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) StatementRead
16 Jun 2026An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate) Speech · 4 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Dec 2025EU Defence Readiness (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2025Ending all energy imports from Russia to the EU and closing loopholes through third countries (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 30 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 21

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
27 Apr 2026Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705Written questionwith 49 co-authors14 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0215Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—
17 Apr 2026Equal treatment of sport shooting disciplines under the proposed lead shot restrictions E-10-2026-001591Written question9 Jun 2026
24 Mar 2026Restricting lead shot under the REACH Regulation P-10-2026-001214Priority written question17 Apr 2026
10 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0146Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
25 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0546Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors—
8 Oct 2025REACH restriction on lead in rimfire ammunition E-10-2025-003959Written question21 Nov 2025
2 Oct 2025Russian jets violating Estonian airspace P-10-2025-003855Priority written questionwith 17 co-authors4 Dec 2025
16 Sept 2025Commission proposal on centrefire ammunition E-10-2025-003562Written questionwith 4 co-authors31 Oct 2025
15 Sept 2025Managing lead gunshot at outdoor sports shooting ranges P-10-2025-003539Priority written question13 Oct 2025

Show all 21 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 34

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
19 Jun 2026Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789892 CJ4623
19 Jun 2026Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087 CJ4630
18 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789893 CJ463
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE7
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788905 ITRE7
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE6
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895 ITRE4
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788849 ITRE6
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788891 ITRE8
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894 ITRE6

Show all 34 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Estonia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Riho TERRAS”. Member record. memberId 204449. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204449?nb=all&page=87&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204449. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204449?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-204449,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Riho TERRAS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204449?nb=all&page=87&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204449?nb=all&page=87&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204449. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204449. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}