Skip to content

Decision

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024

Effect
Adopted
Result
535 for · 24 against · 55 abstained roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:13–13:15
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Fredis Beleris
Topics
EU institutions & Parliament Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
17 votes · 11 roll calls · 8 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote)
Final vote
179295
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 535 for, 24 against, 55 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (8 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 5 rejected).

Backed by The Left, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; Greens mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 22Against 12Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
GreensFor 1Against 3Abst. 42No vote 7 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 101Against 0Abst. 0No vote 35 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 1No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 171Against 0Abst. 2No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 60Against 6Abst. 3No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 4No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 18

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria160130.91
Belgium120550.56
Bulgaria170001.00
Cyprus5001—
Czechia190021.00
Germany67017120.70
Denmark111300.60
Estonia5110—
Spain445290.79
Finland121020.88
France700380.94
Greece106230.33
Croatia100110.86
Hungary140160.90
Ireland111020.88
Italy5154160.78
Lithuania90110.85
Luxembourg4110—
Latvia7011—
Malta5001—
Netherlands200650.65
Poland470150.97
Portugal120091.00
Romania230190.94
Sweden143310.55
Slovenia7011—
Slovakia130021.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Fredis BELERIS GreeceEPPSpeeches29 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI PolandECRSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alex AGIUS SALIBA MaltaS&DSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Virginie JORON FrancePatriotsSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 16 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECRSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Lefteris NIKOLAOU-ALAVANOS GreeceNo groupSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Martin HOJSÍK SlovakiaRenewSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ana MIRANDA PAZ SpainGreensSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Petras GRAŽULIS LithuaniaESNSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pál SZEKERES HungaryPatriotsSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nikos PAPPAS GreeceThe LeftSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Maria ZACHARIA GreeceNo groupSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Alexandra MEHNERT GermanyEPPSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Diego SOLIER changed group SpainECRSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPPSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michał KOBOSKO PolandRenewSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO SpainEPPSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Marcin SYPNIEWSKI PolandESNSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Guillaume PELTIER FranceECRSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches19 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 17

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 3 – Am 3 Roll call123 for, 459 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
Show the other 16 votesShow the other 14 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 3 – Am 3 Roll call123 for, 459 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 4 – Am 4 Roll call104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
5Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4 Show of hands Rejected
6Separate vote on paragraph 5 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – § 5 Roll call490 for, 109 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
7Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 5 – Am 5 Roll call128 for, 431 against, 51 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
8Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 6 – Am 6 Roll call129 for, 449 against, 34 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
9Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 7 – Am 7 Roll call101 for, 497 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
10Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 8 – Am 8 Roll call101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
11Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 9 – Am 13 Roll call65 for, 529 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
12Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 15 – Am 11 Roll call217 for, 333 against, 64 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
13Separate vote on paragraph 20 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Greens
14Paragraph 20 — part 2 A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – § 20/2 Part voted on: “stresses the importance of the implementation by the Catalonian authorities of the recommendations made by the Committee on Petitions in its report of 19 March 2024, intended to safeguard the linguistic rights of students and their families;”Roll call487 for, 97 against, 31 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Greens
15Separate vote on recital D Show of hands Rejected
16Vote on text inserted after recital N Show of hands Rejected
17Final vote — text as a whole A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call535 for, 24 against, 55 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens · split votes by Greens.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0170

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its annual report on the work of the Committee on Petitions in 2024, covering the petitions received and their handling.

The report notes that Parliament received 1,518 petitions in 2024, a 4.3% increase from 2023, with the environment, fundamental rights, and the rule of law among the main concerns.

It also highlights a rise in inadmissible petitions and calls for better citizen awareness of the right to petition.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution reports on the Committee on Petitions' work in 2024, covering petitions received, their subjects, and relations with EU institutions. It calls for improved transparency, accessibility, and cooperation to strengthen the right to petition.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2114(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 9 October 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 19 June 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 24 September 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 29 September 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 9 October 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: PETI · Author: Fredis BELERIS (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024”. Decision, 9 October 2025. votingId 179295, document A-10-2025-0170, reference 2025/2114(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-09/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-10-09-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-09/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-09/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 179295, document A-10-2025-0170, reference 2025/2114(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}