Skip to content

Member

Liudas MAŽYLIS

EPP · Lithuania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
99.6 %ⓘ of 5 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.0 %ⓘ of 5 479 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
TS-LKD Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai
In office
Since 5 Dec 2024
Against clear line
55 of 5 225 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO (substitute), AFET (substitute), DEVE
Member id
197841
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.6 %

5 479 of 5 503 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+9.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.0 %

5 312 of 5 479 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.1 %

55 of 5 225 votes where their group had a clear line

36 opposite (for ↔ against), 18 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.1 %

117 of 5 479 votes cast

Participation 99.6 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Liudas MAŽYLIS99.6 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.0 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Liudas MAŽYLIS97.0 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 101 to Article 47 48 for, 520 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 93, adding text after Article 45 92 for, 496 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 92 to Article 45 79 for, 501 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 91 to Article 42 54 for, 511 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 90 to Article 15 48 for, 521 against, 65 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) Amendment 89 to Article 2 51 for, 509 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore (Resolution) Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 572 for, 18 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 515 for, 93 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore Final vote on the motion for a resolutionRejected 136 for, 432 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Final votePassed 543 for, 72 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 1, adding text after recital 5 73 for, 548 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 4 to Article 1 80 for, 544 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 2 to Article 1– paragraph 1 106 for, 507 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Referral back to committee 426 for, 202 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process Amendment 3 to Article 1 79 for, 539 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final votePassed 382 for, 249 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 265 to recital 28 203 for, 423 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 228 + 287 (voted as one) to recital 26 360 for, 277 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 286 to recital 24 294 for, 337 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 364 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 260 to recital 19 183 for, 457 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 226 + 284 (voted as one) to recital 18 363 for, 276 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 259 to recital 18 179 for, 457 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 365 for, 271 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 352 to recital 14 181 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 364 for, 266 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 367 for, 270 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 351 to recital 9 186 for, 441 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 222 + 280 (voted as one) to recital 7 361 for, 274 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 350 to recital 7 181 for, 444 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 221 + 279 (voted as one) to recital 5 366 for, 273 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 349 to recital 5 179 for, 450 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 394, adding text after recital 2 182 for, 446 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 393 to recital 2 183 for, 445 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 254 + 316 + 2 (voted as one) to Article 4 368 for, 271 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 536 for, 100 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 219 to Article 4 201 for, 426 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 217 to Article 4 210 for, 423 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 215 to Article 4 211 for, 423 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 212 to Article 4 209 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 210 to Article 4 209 for, 425 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 208 to Article 4 207 for, 430 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 207 + 266 + 348 (voted as one) to Article 4 251 for, 378 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 253 + 315 (voted as one) to Article 4 361 for, 280 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 115 to Article 4 238 for, 395 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 205 to Article 4 94 for, 532 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 252 + 314 (voted as one) to Article 4 364 for, 270 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 251 + 313 (voted as one) to Article 4 364 for, 270 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendments 311 + 398 (voted as one) to Article 4 365 for, 276 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Amendment 308 to Article 4 114 for, 522 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 88 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 327 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania97 % of 4 237 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania97 % of 4 703 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 4 369 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 4 416 shared89 %
Niels GEUKING EPPGermany97 % of 5 430 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 3 266 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania97 % of 4 954 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 4 230 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 5 225 shared89 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 885 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 789 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 5 297 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania86 % of 4 077 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 180 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 4 208 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 4 260 shared82 %
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance86 % of 1 942 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 769 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium85 % of 4 928 shared82 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember16 Dec 2024now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Need for a long-term EU development cooperation strategy to face challenges in education in developing countriesShadow rapporteurDEVE22 Sept 2026
EU strategy to face the new theories against democracyShadow rapporteur for an opinionDEVE12 Dec 2025
Mission to Yerevan, Armenia in connection with the 12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PA, 28-30 October, 2025.\nOfficial delegationDEPA9 Oct 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

51 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 66 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 73

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
9 Jun 2026Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380Written questionwith 15 co-authors21 Aug 2026

Show all 73 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070 CJ1937
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789071 CJ1911
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789072 CJ1914
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789067 CJ1918
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068 CJ1920
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789069 CJ1943
22 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697 AFET21
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346 AFET15
10 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Moldova AFET-AM-786967 AFET21
19 Mar 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 DEVE-AM-785438 DEVE38

Show all 25 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Liudas MAŽYLIS”. Member record. memberId 197841. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?nb=all&page=62&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197841?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197841,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Liudas MAŽYLIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?nb=all&page=62&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?nb=all&page=62&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197841. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}