Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 35

Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 35
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 22 Jan 2026
Result
364 for · 258 against · 5 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 6 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, EPP
Official label
A10-0268/2025 – Olivier Chastel – After § 35 – Am 3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0268
Dossier
2025/2034(INI)
Vote id
183890
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 364 for, 258 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 4Against 45Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 2Against 111Abst. 1No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 12Against 51Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 166Against 1Abst. 1No vote 19 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 15Against 11Abst. 2No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland020
France090
Greece030
Ireland020
Italy090
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 566 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 567 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 240 + 300 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 569 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 246 + 306 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 282 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greens, S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 572 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 237 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 571 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 569 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 270 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 569 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 3 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183890
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 35 — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 183890, reference 2025/2034(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183890 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-183890,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 35 — Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183890}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183890},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183890, reference 2025/2034(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}