Skip to content

Member

Nicola PROCACCINI

ECR · Italy

Group
ECR
Country
Italy
Roll-call participation
86.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
94.2 %ⓘ of 532 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
FdL FRATELLI D' ITALIA
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 445 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), EMPL (substitute), ENVI, ITRE
Member id
197820
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

86.3 %

535 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.2 %

501 of 532 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (+6.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.8 %

8 of 445 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

17.4 %

93 of 535 votes cast

Participation 86.3 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Nicola PROCACCINI86.3 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 94.2 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Nicola PROCACCINI94.2 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 417 for, 138 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 381 for, 118 against, 36 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 357 for, 134 against, 53 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 343 for, 154 against, 59 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 351 for, 141 against, 68 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 391 for, 116 against, 54 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 338 for, 147 against, 66 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 423 for, 108 against, 27 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 182 for, 369 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 392 for, 153 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point s 128 for, 376 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 343 for, 146 against, 68 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 386 for, 165 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 275 for, 252 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 373 for, 139 against, 53 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p 470 for, 62 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point o 179 for, 368 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 280 for, 265 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 415 for, 97 against, 54 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 2 240 for, 316 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 420 for, 88 against, 56 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point j 533 for, 28 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 286 for, 237 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 386 for, 120 against, 61 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 255 for, 290 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 1 464 for, 33 against, 76 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point f 200 for, 230 against, 129 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point b 201 for, 248 against, 114 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, point a 104 for, 398 against, 59 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital O 257 for, 297 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital N 270 for, 287 against, 23 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 2 258 for, 290 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 1 447 for, 102 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 239 for, 299 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 349 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 2 254 for, 315 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 1 491 for, 43 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 2 246 for, 318 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 1 470 for, 64 against, 46 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 2 250 for, 310 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 1 467 for, 100 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 211 for, 358 against, 3 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3 253 for, 321 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG 265 for, 273 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2 269 for, 302 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1 397 for, 133 against, 49 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2 220 for, 319 against, 39 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1 426 for, 72 against, 82 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 13 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Alessandro CIRIANI ECRItaly99 % of 4 628 shared81 %
Antonella SBERNA ECRItaly99 % of 4 673 shared81 %
Francesco TORSELLI ECRItaly99 % of 5 012 shared81 %
Carlo FIDANZA ECRItaly99 % of 4 958 shared81 %
Francesco VENTOLA ECRItaly99 % of 4 570 shared81 %
Denis NESCI ECRItaly99 % of 5 116 shared81 %
Daniele POLATO ECRItaly99 % of 5 042 shared81 %
Alberico GAMBINO ECRItaly99 % of 3 946 shared81 %
Mario MANTOVANI ECRItaly99 % of 3 668 shared81 %
Marco SQUARTA ECRItaly99 % of 4 250 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal73 % of 4 891 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 684 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia72 % of 4 186 shared62 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain72 % of 4 796 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain72 % of 5 095 shared68 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain72 % of 3 945 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain72 % of 3 850 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain72 % of 5 048 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania71 % of 4 249 shared48 %
Branko GRIMS changed group No groupSlovenia71 % of 4 651 shared50 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute6 Jul 2026now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on European Cultural Heritage, Ways of Saint James and other European Cultural RoutesIG10-11 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Wine, Quality Foodstuffs and SpiritsIG10-28 Intergroup / working groupMember23 Jan 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Maritime transport: monitoring, reporting and verification and alignment with revisions of the EU Emissions Trading SystemShadow rapporteurENVI9 Sept 2026

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

41 contributions recorded; 33 on behalf of their group; 103 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 66

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Sept 2026New liquid drugs and the evolving narcotics market in the EU E-10-2026-003435Written questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Paolo De Rosa’s links with the Autistici/Inventati hacker group and Italy’s Democratic Party P-10-2026-003407Priority written questionwith 20 co-authorsNot yet answered
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
17 Jul 2026Regulation (EU) 2023/2055 for industrial downstream users of plastics: distinction between producers and processors E-10-2026-003043Written questionwith 9 co-authors4 Sept 2026
2 Jul 2026EU financing instruments for the deployment of fusion energy infrastructure E-10-2026-002744Written questionwith 13 co-authors18 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 27 March 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/688 as regards infection with bluetongue virus (serotypes 1-24) and infection with epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus and introducing a derogation for movements of registered equine animals B-10-2026-0342Motion for a resolutionwith 40 co-authors—
26 Jun 2026External interference of Islamic fundamentalism in Europe E-10-2026-002652Written questionwith 9 co-authors18 Sept 2026
9 Jun 2026Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery: shortcomings in the technical framework and risks to Europe’s industrial competitiveness E-10-2026-002354Written questionwith 5 co-authors6 Aug 2026
14 May 2026Strategic coherence and urgent need for high-level political dialogue on the CCUS value chain for Europe’s industrial revival E-10-2026-002025Written questionwith 8 co-authors9 Jul 2026
6 May 2026Cross-border dissemination of fraudulent online financial advertising and identity theft E-10-2026-001834Written questionwith 2 co-authors17 Sept 2026

Show all 66 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 113

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
29 Sept 2026on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards driving competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation ITRE-AM-796257 ITRE1
29 Sept 2026EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation ITRE-AM-796197 ITRE10
29 Sept 2026EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation ITRE-AM-796255 ITRE8
29 Sept 2026EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation ITRE-AM-796198 ITRE13
10 Sept 2026on the proposal for a Regulations (EC) No 561/2006, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/2144 and (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the simplification of technical requirements and testing procedures for motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 70/157/EEC and Regulation No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ITRE-AM-790812 ITRE17
28 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123 ENVI14
23 Jul 2026Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110 ENVI-AM-791125 ENVI34
23 Jul 2026Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110 ENVI-AM-791124 ENVI15
20 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790834 ENVI4
15 Jul 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790846 ENVI7

Show all 113 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nicola PROCACCINI”. Member record. memberId 197820. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197820?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197820. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197820?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197820,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Nicola PROCACCINI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197820?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197820?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197820. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197820. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}