Skip to content

Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
98.2 %ⓘ of 3 838 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 3 770 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line
60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id
197778
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

3 770 of 3 838 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+8.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

3 670 of 3 770 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

60 of 3 569 votes where their group had a clear line

32 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

55 of 3 770 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tom BERENDSEN98.2 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.3 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tom BERENDSEN97.3 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 191 for, 296 against, 143 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 43 79 for, 460 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 20252023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 365 for, 182 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 432 for, 95 against, 124 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG 250 for, 384 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital AH — part 2 of 2 448 for, 186 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE 254 for, 356 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 415 for, 215 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 430 for, 183 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA 590 for, 36 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital H 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 759 shared89 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 742 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 3 594 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 3 045 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 2 789 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 2 955 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 3 321 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 2 984 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 3 093 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany97 % of 3 686 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 3 682 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany89 % of 2 345 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 316 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium88 % of 3 594 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 098 shared82 %
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN RenewGermany88 % of 2 660 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany88 % of 3 672 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 3 247 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 737 shared82 %
Svenja HAHN RenewGermany88 % of 3 368 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
18 Dec 2025European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005Written question9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006Written question12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986Written question24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051Priority written question3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277Motion for a resolution—
5 Jun 2025Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020Oral questionNot yet answered
27 May 2025Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111Written questionwith 1 co-author31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790Priority written question18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123Written question2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=34&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=34&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=34&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}